Bankruptcy Law in China

{"title":"Bankruptcy Law in China","authors":"","doi":"10.5040/9781509932474.ch-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis focuses on the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People’s Republic of China (Trial Implementation) (the “1986 Bankruptcy Law”), its textual stipulations, its instrumental application and under-utilization, and concludes with suggestions for future reforms. This thesis starts with a brief review over China’s economic reform since the 1980s. Following the successful agricultural reform in the countryside, China started a new round of more dramatic reform in the public industrial sector beginning in 1984. As the reform progresses, bankruptcy came to the forefront as the state hoped it would force the SOEs either to improve their management or face the specter of bankruptcy. The reality shows, however, that the law has not achieved its proposed goals. Empirical research reveals that government has applied it selectively rather than automatically. The recent Guangdong International Trust and Investment Company (“GITIC”) bankruptcy case shows how the law is being used by the central government to recentralize the country’s financial control. Empirical study also reveals that the law is also being selectively used to help the government restructure the country’s industrial structure. The reasons behind this failure of application include both technical impediments inherent to law (such as the defects in commencement proceedings, loopholes in the","PeriodicalId":430039,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Bankruptcy Law in China","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Bankruptcy Law in China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509932474.ch-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This thesis focuses on the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People’s Republic of China (Trial Implementation) (the “1986 Bankruptcy Law”), its textual stipulations, its instrumental application and under-utilization, and concludes with suggestions for future reforms. This thesis starts with a brief review over China’s economic reform since the 1980s. Following the successful agricultural reform in the countryside, China started a new round of more dramatic reform in the public industrial sector beginning in 1984. As the reform progresses, bankruptcy came to the forefront as the state hoped it would force the SOEs either to improve their management or face the specter of bankruptcy. The reality shows, however, that the law has not achieved its proposed goals. Empirical research reveals that government has applied it selectively rather than automatically. The recent Guangdong International Trust and Investment Company (“GITIC”) bankruptcy case shows how the law is being used by the central government to recentralize the country’s financial control. Empirical study also reveals that the law is also being selectively used to help the government restructure the country’s industrial structure. The reasons behind this failure of application include both technical impediments inherent to law (such as the defects in commencement proceedings, loopholes in the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国破产法
本文主要对《中华人民共和国企业破产法(试行)》(1986年破产法)及其文本规定、工具性适用和运用不足进行了研究,并对今后的改革提出了建议。本文首先简要回顾了20世纪80年代以来中国的经济改革。随着农村农业改革的成功,中国从1984年开始在公共工业部门进行了新一轮更大幅度的改革。随着改革的推进,破产问题浮出水面,因为国家希望国企要么改善管理,要么面临破产的阴影。然而,现实表明,该法律并没有实现其提出的目标。实证研究表明,政府是有选择地而非自动地应用了这一政策。最近的广东国际信托投资公司(gtic)破产案表明,中央政府正在利用该法重新集中国家的金融控制权。实证研究还表明,该法律还被选择性地用于帮助政府调整国家的产业结构。这种申请失败背后的原因包括法律固有的技术障碍(如启动程序的缺陷,法律的漏洞)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Fourth Constraint – Non-EBL Debt Enforcement Mechanisms The First Constraint – Creditors and Debtors Feel Insufficiently Protected under the EBL The Third Constraint – Limitations and Biases of EBL Enforcers Limited Use of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law 2006 and its Causes China’s Socio-Economic, Political and Legal Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1