Comparison Between Block-Wise Detection and A Modular Selective Approach

Huitao Wang, Kai Su, I. M. Chowdhury, Qiangfu Zhao, Yoichi Tomioka
{"title":"Comparison Between Block-Wise Detection and A Modular Selective Approach","authors":"Huitao Wang, Kai Su, I. M. Chowdhury, Qiangfu Zhao, Yoichi Tomioka","doi":"10.1109/iCAST51195.2020.9319484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On-road risk detection and alert system is a crucial and important task in our day to day life. Deep Learning approaches have got much attention in solving this noble task. In this paper, we have performed a comparative study on two recent architectures that handle the on-road risk detection task, which are Block-Wise Detection and Modular Selective Network (MS-Net). In the Block-Wise Detection, we have used the VGG19, VGG19-BN, and ResNet family as the backbone network. On the other hand, for MS-Net we have used the ResNet-44 as the router and ResNet-101 as the expert network. In this experiment, we evaluate our model on an “on-road risk detection dataset”, which was created by our research group using an RGB-D sensor mounted on a senior car. On this dataset, we can achieve an accuracy of 89.40% for MS-Net. For the Block-Wise Detection model, we can achieve an accuracy of 90.51% if we use ResNet-50 as the backbone network. However, if we choose the network models used in MS-Net, we can double the inference speed. Thus, compared with Block-Wise Detection, we think the overall performance of MS-NET is better, and is potentially more useful for driving assistance of elderly drivers.","PeriodicalId":212570,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iCAST51195.2020.9319484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On-road risk detection and alert system is a crucial and important task in our day to day life. Deep Learning approaches have got much attention in solving this noble task. In this paper, we have performed a comparative study on two recent architectures that handle the on-road risk detection task, which are Block-Wise Detection and Modular Selective Network (MS-Net). In the Block-Wise Detection, we have used the VGG19, VGG19-BN, and ResNet family as the backbone network. On the other hand, for MS-Net we have used the ResNet-44 as the router and ResNet-101 as the expert network. In this experiment, we evaluate our model on an “on-road risk detection dataset”, which was created by our research group using an RGB-D sensor mounted on a senior car. On this dataset, we can achieve an accuracy of 89.40% for MS-Net. For the Block-Wise Detection model, we can achieve an accuracy of 90.51% if we use ResNet-50 as the backbone network. However, if we choose the network models used in MS-Net, we can double the inference speed. Thus, compared with Block-Wise Detection, we think the overall performance of MS-NET is better, and is potentially more useful for driving assistance of elderly drivers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分块检测与模块化选择方法的比较
道路风险检测与预警系统是我们日常生活中必不可少的一项重要任务。深度学习方法在解决这一崇高任务方面受到了广泛关注。在本文中,我们对处理道路风险检测任务的两种最新架构进行了比较研究,这两种架构分别是块智能检测和模块化选择网络(MS-Net)。在块智能检测中,我们使用了VGG19、VGG19- bn和ResNet家族作为骨干网。另一方面,对于MS-Net,我们使用了ResNet-44作为路由器,ResNet-101作为专家网络。在本实验中,我们在“道路风险检测数据集”上评估我们的模型,该数据集是由我们的研究小组使用安装在高级车上的RGB-D传感器创建的。在这个数据集上,MS-Net的准确率可以达到89.40%。对于块智能检测模型,如果我们使用ResNet-50作为骨干网,我们可以达到90.51%的准确率。然而,如果我们选择MS-Net中使用的网络模型,我们可以将推理速度提高一倍。因此,与Block-Wise Detection相比,我们认为MS-NET的整体性能更好,并且可能对老年驾驶员的驾驶辅助更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Skeleton Guided Conflict-Free Hand Gesture Recognition for Robot Control Improved Spiking Neural Networks with multiple neurons for digit recognition A Lightweight Transformer with Convolutional Attention Social Media Mining with Dynamic Clustering: A Case Study by COVID-19 Tweets A Visual-SLAM based Line Laser Scanning System using Semantically Segmented Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1