Posterior cervical angle and cervical length in predicting the successful induction of labour in nulliparous woman

Karam M. Bayoumy, A. Yehia, M. Salman, N. Alkady
{"title":"Posterior cervical angle and cervical length in predicting the successful induction of labour in nulliparous woman","authors":"Karam M. Bayoumy, A. Yehia, M. Salman, N. Alkady","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17770.1037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:To assess the value of pre-induction sonographic assessment of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL).Patients and Methods:The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from 1st November 2018 to 31st May 2019. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was compared.Results: The analysis included 41 women with successful IOL and 29 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 100°, a cervical length of less than 31 mm, and a Bishop score of more than four. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 100° had the best sensitivity (87.80%), specificity (86.21), positive predictive value (90%), negative predictive value (83.3%) compared with the other two predictors.Conclusion: Posterior cervical angle had the best accuracy in predicting successful induction of labor compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17770.1037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective:To assess the value of pre-induction sonographic assessment of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL).Patients and Methods:The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from 1st November 2018 to 31st May 2019. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was compared.Results: The analysis included 41 women with successful IOL and 29 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 100°, a cervical length of less than 31 mm, and a Bishop score of more than four. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 100° had the best sensitivity (87.80%), specificity (86.21), positive predictive value (90%), negative predictive value (83.3%) compared with the other two predictors.Conclusion: Posterior cervical angle had the best accuracy in predicting successful induction of labor compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈后角和宫颈长度对无产妇女成功引产的预测作用
目的:探讨引产前超声评估宫颈后角(PCA)和宫颈长度对人工智能(IOL)成功的预测价值。患者和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究包括2018年11月1日至2019年5月31日在埃及开罗Ain-Shams妇产医院妇产科接受经阴道超声检查和Bishop评分评估PCA和宫颈长度的IOL患者。比较了这些测试在预测成功人工晶状体(定义为阴道分娩)方面的准确性。结果:41例人工晶状体手术成功,29例人工晶状体手术失败。预测人工晶状体成功的临界值是PCA大于100°,宫颈长度小于31 mm, Bishop评分大于4分。三种测量方法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积无显著差异。然而,与其他两种预测因子相比,大于100°的PCA具有最佳的敏感性(87.80%),特异性(86.21),阳性预测值(90%),阴性预测值(83.3%)。结论:与宫颈长度和Bishop评分相比,颈后角预测引产成功的准确性最高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1