A Matter of Individual Thought and Conscience? Grimmark v Sweden, and Strasbourg’s Approach to Conscientious Objection in Abortion Procedures

James E. Hurford
{"title":"A Matter of Individual Thought and Conscience? Grimmark v Sweden, and Strasbourg’s Approach to Conscientious Objection in Abortion Procedures","authors":"James E. Hurford","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1929676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. The right to obtain abortion remains one of the more divisive ethical topics. Vast differences in opinion exist about the morality of abortion. Consider, for example, the chasm that exists between the position of the Catholic Church that life is sacred and must be defended from conception, and the – admittedly fringe – view that even birth does not make a baby a person. It is unquestionably a subject on which ‘strong moral and religious convictions are held’.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1929676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

1. The right to obtain abortion remains one of the more divisive ethical topics. Vast differences in opinion exist about the morality of abortion. Consider, for example, the chasm that exists between the position of the Catholic Church that life is sacred and must be defended from conception, and the – admittedly fringe – view that even birth does not make a baby a person. It is unquestionably a subject on which ‘strong moral and religious convictions are held’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人思想和良心的问题?格里姆马克诉瑞典案,以及斯特拉斯堡对堕胎程序中良心反对的态度
1. 获得堕胎的权利仍然是一个比较有争议的伦理话题。在堕胎的道德问题上存在着巨大的意见分歧。例如,天主教会认为生命是神圣的,必须从受孕中得到保护,而另一种观点认为即使出生也不能使婴儿成为一个人,这是公认的边缘观点,考虑一下两者之间存在的鸿沟。毫无疑问,这是一个“强烈的道德和宗教信念”的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1