The form of easement agreement under the civil legislation of Ukraine

V.I. Tsytulskyi
{"title":"The form of easement agreement under the civil legislation of Ukraine","authors":"V.I. Tsytulskyi","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.61.2.10-2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The agreement as a universal legal category and a unique means of legal regulation gives rise to a variety of relations, including the right to use someone else’s property, called an easement in civil law. Therefore, the issues of form of these agreements are of particular importance, both in the context of the legal consequences of its non-compliance, and in view of the importance of proper fixation of the agreements reached between the parties.The article is devoted to the analysis of the form of an easement agreement under the civil legislation of Ukraine. A special attention is paid to the issue of the institution of the requirement for transaction notarization, in particular, the establishment (cancellation) of the requirement by the owner for notarization of a land easement agreement.It is concluded that as of today, the easement agreement is subject to a conclusion in writing and, under certain conditions defined by the legislation of Ukraine, it should be notarized. Certainly, as far as immovable property is concerned, the notarial form is also due to the fact that in accordance with the Law of Ukraine «On State Registration of Property Rights to Immovable Property and Their Encumbrances», the notaries perform the functions of the state registrar of property rights and can ensure state registration of the right of the easement as a property right. On the other hand, according to the current legislation of Ukraine, it is possible to certify transactions in those areas where there are no notaries, by means of other bodies and officials (for example, officials of local self-government bodies) and this certification will be equal to the notarial one. However, in these cases, the problem of registering property rights under an easement is still unresolved. Therefore, within the framework of the existing legal regulation, in order to balance public and private interests, the broadest introduction of the current system of e-notaries and its further improvement can be a worthy alternative and means of relief.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.61.2.10-2.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The agreement as a universal legal category and a unique means of legal regulation gives rise to a variety of relations, including the right to use someone else’s property, called an easement in civil law. Therefore, the issues of form of these agreements are of particular importance, both in the context of the legal consequences of its non-compliance, and in view of the importance of proper fixation of the agreements reached between the parties.The article is devoted to the analysis of the form of an easement agreement under the civil legislation of Ukraine. A special attention is paid to the issue of the institution of the requirement for transaction notarization, in particular, the establishment (cancellation) of the requirement by the owner for notarization of a land easement agreement.It is concluded that as of today, the easement agreement is subject to a conclusion in writing and, under certain conditions defined by the legislation of Ukraine, it should be notarized. Certainly, as far as immovable property is concerned, the notarial form is also due to the fact that in accordance with the Law of Ukraine «On State Registration of Property Rights to Immovable Property and Their Encumbrances», the notaries perform the functions of the state registrar of property rights and can ensure state registration of the right of the easement as a property right. On the other hand, according to the current legislation of Ukraine, it is possible to certify transactions in those areas where there are no notaries, by means of other bodies and officials (for example, officials of local self-government bodies) and this certification will be equal to the notarial one. However, in these cases, the problem of registering property rights under an easement is still unresolved. Therefore, within the framework of the existing legal regulation, in order to balance public and private interests, the broadest introduction of the current system of e-notaries and its further improvement can be a worthy alternative and means of relief.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰民事立法下地役权协议的形式
协议作为一种普遍的法律范畴和独特的法律规制手段,产生了多种关系,其中包括使用他人财产的权利,在民法中称为地役权。因此,这些协定的形式问题特别重要,既考虑到不遵守协定的法律后果,又考虑到适当确定各方之间达成的协定的重要性。本文对乌克兰民事立法中地役权协议的形式进行了分析。特别关注交易公证要求的制度问题,特别是土地地役权协议的所有权人公证要求的设立(取消)问题。结论是,截至今天,地役权协议必须以书面形式缔结,并在乌克兰立法规定的某些条件下,应进行公证。当然,就不动产而言,公证形式也是由于这样一个事实,即根据乌克兰法律“关于不动产及其产权的国家登记”,公证人履行国家产权登记员的职能,并确保地役权作为财产权进行国家登记。另一方面,根据乌克兰现行立法,可以通过其他机构和官员(例如,地方自治机构的官员)在没有公证人的地区证明交易,这种证明将等同于公证。但是,在这些情况下,地役权下的产权登记问题仍然没有解决。因此,在现有法律规制的框架内,为了平衡公共利益和私人利益,最广泛地引入现行的电子公证员制度并对其进行进一步完善,可以是一种有价值的替代方案和救济手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1