Carriage of Class 1 and Class 2 Integron in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Burn Patients in Tehran Hospitals, Iran.

M. Goudarzi, M. Fazeli, M. Azad, S. Seyedjavadi, R. Mousavi, M. Rashidan, E. Azargashb
{"title":"Carriage of Class 1 and Class 2 Integron in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Burn Patients in Tehran Hospitals, Iran.","authors":"M. Goudarzi, M. Fazeli, M. Azad, S. Seyedjavadi, R. Mousavi, M. Rashidan, E. Azargashb","doi":"10.7727/wimj.2014.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nTo investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates and their associations with the existence of integrons.\n\n\nMethods\nDuring a 12-month study, 140 clinically significant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were collected from patients hospitalized in the burn ward of different hospitals in Tehran. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were identified using standard laboratory procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 13 antimicrobial agents according to the standard Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The frequency of Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons was detected using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.\n\n\nResults\nThe resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to 13 antimicrobial agents were between 34.7% and 90.8%. Ceftriaxone and imipenem had good activity against the isolates. Of 140 tested isolates, 91 (65%) were multidrug resistant. The most predominant resistance profile among the isolates included resistance to 10 (12.14%), 9 (12.14%) and 8 (12.14%) antibiotics. Class 1 and 2 integrons were detected in 57.2% (56/98) and 30.6% (30/98) of tested Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Of 98 (70%) integron positive isolates, only 12 (12.2%) isolates were positive for both classes of integrons. Resistance of the isolates to cefotaxime, aztreonam, imipenem, tobramycin, ticarcillin, ciprofloxacin and cloxacillin was observed to be significantly associated with the existence of integrons.\n\n\nConclusion\nThese data confirmed high prevalence of Class 1 integrons among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burn patients in this study. Based on these results, integrons may play an important role in the possible transmission of resistance genes to the clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.","PeriodicalId":104133,"journal":{"name":"The West Indian medical journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Indian medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2014.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates and their associations with the existence of integrons. Methods During a 12-month study, 140 clinically significant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were collected from patients hospitalized in the burn ward of different hospitals in Tehran. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were identified using standard laboratory procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 13 antimicrobial agents according to the standard Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The frequency of Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons was detected using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Results The resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to 13 antimicrobial agents were between 34.7% and 90.8%. Ceftriaxone and imipenem had good activity against the isolates. Of 140 tested isolates, 91 (65%) were multidrug resistant. The most predominant resistance profile among the isolates included resistance to 10 (12.14%), 9 (12.14%) and 8 (12.14%) antibiotics. Class 1 and 2 integrons were detected in 57.2% (56/98) and 30.6% (30/98) of tested Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Of 98 (70%) integron positive isolates, only 12 (12.2%) isolates were positive for both classes of integrons. Resistance of the isolates to cefotaxime, aztreonam, imipenem, tobramycin, ticarcillin, ciprofloxacin and cloxacillin was observed to be significantly associated with the existence of integrons. Conclusion These data confirmed high prevalence of Class 1 integrons among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burn patients in this study. Based on these results, integrons may play an important role in the possible transmission of resistance genes to the clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗德黑兰医院烧伤患者多药耐药铜绿假单胞菌中1类和2类整合子的携带
目的探讨铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的药敏模式及其与整合子存在的关系。方法在为期12个月的研究中,从德黑兰不同医院烧伤住院患者中收集140株具有临床意义的铜绿假单胞菌。铜绿假单胞菌分离物采用标准实验室程序进行鉴定。按照标准Kirby-Bauer盘片扩散法和临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南对13种抗菌药物进行药敏试验。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法检测1、2和3类整合子的频率。结果铜绿假单胞菌分离株对13种抗菌药物的耐药率为34.7% ~ 90.8%;头孢曲松和亚胺培南对分离菌具有良好的抑菌活性。在140株检测的分离株中,91株(65%)具有多重耐药。菌株对10种(12.14%)、9种(12.14%)和8种(12.14%)抗生素耐药最多。铜绿假单胞菌分离株中检出1类整合子57.2%(56/98),2类整合子30.6%(30/98)。在98株(70%)整合子阳性菌株中,只有12株(12.2%)两类整合子均阳性。分离株对头孢噻肟、氨曲南、亚胺培南、妥布霉素、替卡西林、环丙沙星和氯西林的耐药性与整合子的存在显著相关。结论本研究证实了烧伤患者铜绿假单胞菌中1类整合子的高流行率。基于这些结果,整合子可能在耐药基因传播给临床铜绿假单胞菌分离株的过程中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Salmonella enterica arthritis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Vitamin D deficiency rickets in infants presenting with hypocalcaemic convulsions. Gastroesophageal reflux and reflux oesophageal strictures in children with Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Severe sepsis in the emergency department - an observational cohort study from the university hospital of the West Indies. Effect of clopidogrel with or without omeprazole in patients with carotid artery stenting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1