Point of No Return? Fair Use on Trial

Norm Medeiros
{"title":"Point of No Return? Fair Use on Trial","authors":"Norm Medeiros","doi":"10.1108/10650751111182551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This article seeks to discuss the implications of the Cambridge University Press et al. lawsuit filed against Georgia State University.Design/methodology/approach – The article concerns itself with the root causes of the lawsuit, and the bizarre nature of producers suing a member of their primary clientele.Findings – The article does not offer an opinion on which party should or will prevail, but instead focuses on the growing divide between publishers and academia, which seems headed for a showdown.Originality/value – The article offers another perspective on the pending lawsuit, which has the potential to define fair use in a quantifiable way.","PeriodicalId":444419,"journal":{"name":"OCLC Syst. Serv.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCLC Syst. Serv.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/10650751111182551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose – This article seeks to discuss the implications of the Cambridge University Press et al. lawsuit filed against Georgia State University.Design/methodology/approach – The article concerns itself with the root causes of the lawsuit, and the bizarre nature of producers suing a member of their primary clientele.Findings – The article does not offer an opinion on which party should or will prevail, but instead focuses on the growing divide between publishers and academia, which seems headed for a showdown.Originality/value – The article offers another perspective on the pending lawsuit, which has the potential to define fair use in a quantifiable way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不归路?试用合理使用
目的-本文旨在讨论剑桥大学出版社等人对佐治亚州立大学提起诉讼的影响。设计/方法/方法——这篇文章关注的是诉讼的根本原因,以及生产商起诉其主要客户的奇怪性质。调查结果-这篇文章并没有给出哪一方应该或将会获胜的意见,而是将重点放在出版商和学术界之间日益扩大的分歧上,这似乎正在走向摊牌。原创性/价值——这篇文章提供了对未决诉讼的另一种视角,它有可能以可量化的方式定义合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dramatis personae Partnerships: the engaged university and library publishing Internal customer service assessment of cataloging, acquisitions, and library systems Paths of the mind Information organizations and the Lean approach to service delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1