{"title":"The United Kingdom before and after Brexit","authors":"Benjamin Leruth, P. Taylor-Gooby","doi":"10.4337/9781789906745.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Kingdom’s liberal welfare state has undergone profound changes since the Great Recession. Torn between individualism (advocated by successive governments under David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson) and predistribution (advocated by the Labour Party), the country has also not been immune to populism through the rise in influence of the UK Independence Party in the mid-2010s and policies advocated by Boris Johnson. Over the past decade, the most notable event that divided the country was the vote to leave the United Kingdom. Even though Brexit is best understood as a distinctive process of differentiated disintegration in the European uUnion and its long-term socio-economic effects remain difficult to predict, it certainly had a direct impact on the nature of the British welfare state itself, as welfare chauvinistic measures were proposed by David Cameron as part of the failed renegotiation package. These proposals were approved by the European Council, further suggesting that welfare chauvinism can be accepted (or at least tolerated) by other European member states. This chapter explores the past, present and future of the liberal welfare state in Europe. Following a review of the definition and conceptualisation of liberal welfare regimes, it offers a history of the development of the British welfare state and how it shifted towards neo-liberalism from the 1970s onwards. It then focuses on the Great Recession and the subsequent Brexit vote to assess how these events have affected the British Welfare State. The chapter then concludes by reflecting on the impact the Covid-19 crisis may have on the future of social policy in the UK. © Bent Greve 2021.","PeriodicalId":178534,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","volume":"311 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
英国脱欧前后
自经济大衰退以来,英国的自由福利国家经历了深刻的变化。在个人主义(由大卫·卡梅伦、特蕾莎·梅和鲍里斯·约翰逊领导的历届政府所倡导)和预分配(由工党所倡导)之间,英国也未能通过2010年代中期英国独立党影响力的上升和鲍里斯·约翰逊所倡导的政策而免受民粹主义的影响。在过去的十年里,分裂这个国家的最引人注目的事件是投票脱离英国。尽管英国脱欧最好被理解为欧盟分化解体的独特过程,其长期的社会经济影响仍难以预测,但它肯定对英国福利国家本身的性质产生了直接影响,因为戴维•卡梅伦(David Cameron)提出的福利沙文主义措施是失败的重新谈判方案的一部分。这些提议得到了欧洲理事会的批准,进一步表明福利沙文主义可以被其他欧洲成员国接受(或至少容忍)。本章探讨了欧洲自由福利国家的过去、现在和未来。在回顾了自由福利制度的定义和概念化之后,它提供了英国福利国家的发展历史,以及它如何从20世纪70年代开始转向新自由主义。然后,它将重点放在大衰退和随后的英国脱欧公投上,以评估这些事件如何影响英国的福利国家。最后,本章反思了新冠肺炎危机可能对英国未来社会政策的影响。©Bent Greve 2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。