E-lending in digital libraries: a systematic review

Mehdi Alipour-hafezi, Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar
{"title":"E-lending in digital libraries: a systematic review","authors":"Mehdi Alipour-hafezi, Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar","doi":"10.1108/ILDS-01-2016-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to systematically review e-lending research studies in the digital library domain to identify their subjects, existing research gap and their research methods. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThis is a systematic review. Through several stages of searching in related databases, 30 research works including journal and conference research papers, theses and dissertations, research and technical reports were identified and reviewed based on the guidelines of systematic review protocols. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nIt was found that research in e-lending domain is growing, and the subject will receive greater attention in the near future. Studies were in the following four categories: e-books (specifications, creation and software and viewpoints), business models, e-book status in libraries and copyright issues, e-book lending and inter-library loan. Some research gaps were identified including e-lending domain, business models and legislation. Little has been done with qualitative and mixed approaches in terms of research methods. Moreover, findings showed that this area has received less attention in developing countries. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis is the first review of the e-lending domain in digital libraries. It identifies the key works related to e-lending, categorizes them, provides an overview and identifies emerging research issues.","PeriodicalId":130902,"journal":{"name":"Interlending & Document Supply","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interlending & Document Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-01-2016-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to systematically review e-lending research studies in the digital library domain to identify their subjects, existing research gap and their research methods. Design/methodology/approach This is a systematic review. Through several stages of searching in related databases, 30 research works including journal and conference research papers, theses and dissertations, research and technical reports were identified and reviewed based on the guidelines of systematic review protocols. Findings It was found that research in e-lending domain is growing, and the subject will receive greater attention in the near future. Studies were in the following four categories: e-books (specifications, creation and software and viewpoints), business models, e-book status in libraries and copyright issues, e-book lending and inter-library loan. Some research gaps were identified including e-lending domain, business models and legislation. Little has been done with qualitative and mixed approaches in terms of research methods. Moreover, findings showed that this area has received less attention in developing countries. Originality/value This is the first review of the e-lending domain in digital libraries. It identifies the key works related to e-lending, categorizes them, provides an overview and identifies emerging research issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字图书馆的电子借阅:系统回顾
本文的目的是系统地回顾数字图书馆领域的电子借阅研究,以确定其研究主题、现有研究差距和研究方法。这是一篇系统的综述。通过对相关数据库的多个阶段的检索,根据系统评审方案的指导,确定并评审了包括期刊和会议研究论文、论文和学位论文、研究和技术报告在内的30篇研究作品。研究发现,电子借阅领域的研究正在不断发展,在不久的将来,这一主题将受到越来越多的关注。研究分为以下四类:电子书(规格、创作、软件和观点)、商业模式、电子书在图书馆的地位和版权问题、电子书借阅和馆际互借。研究发现了一些空白,包括电子借贷领域、商业模式和立法。在研究方法方面,定性和混合方法做得很少。此外,调查结果表明,这一领域在发展中国家受到的关注较少。这是对数字图书馆电子借阅领域的首次回顾。它确定了与电子借阅相关的关键工作,对它们进行了分类,提供了概述并确定了新兴的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open science: a revolution in sight? Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature; 93 Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS) Share resources through the largest interlibrary loan network A farewell from the editor to Interlending and Document Supply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1