Towards Unified Vulnerability Assessment with Open Data

Akihito Nakamura
{"title":"Towards Unified Vulnerability Assessment with Open Data","authors":"Akihito Nakamura","doi":"10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous and comprehensive vulnerability management is a difficult task for administrators. The difficulties are not because of a lack of tools, but because they are designed without service-oriented architecture viewpoint and there is insufficient trustworthy machine-readable input data. This paper presents a service-oriented architecture for vulnerability assessment systems based on the open security standards and related contents. If the functions are provided as a service, various kinds of security applications can be interoperated and integrated in loosely-coupled way. We also studied the effectiveness of the available public data for automated vulnerability assessment. Despite the large amount of efforts that goes toward describing machine-readable assessment test in conformity to the OVAL standard, the evaluation result proves inadequate for comprehensive vulnerability assessment. Only about 12% of all the known vulnerabilities are covered by existing OVAL tests, while some popular client applications in the Top 30 with most unique vulnerabilities are covered more than 90%.","PeriodicalId":152957,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops","volume":"319 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Continuous and comprehensive vulnerability management is a difficult task for administrators. The difficulties are not because of a lack of tools, but because they are designed without service-oriented architecture viewpoint and there is insufficient trustworthy machine-readable input data. This paper presents a service-oriented architecture for vulnerability assessment systems based on the open security standards and related contents. If the functions are provided as a service, various kinds of security applications can be interoperated and integrated in loosely-coupled way. We also studied the effectiveness of the available public data for automated vulnerability assessment. Despite the large amount of efforts that goes toward describing machine-readable assessment test in conformity to the OVAL standard, the evaluation result proves inadequate for comprehensive vulnerability assessment. Only about 12% of all the known vulnerabilities are covered by existing OVAL tests, while some popular client applications in the Top 30 with most unique vulnerabilities are covered more than 90%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向开放数据的统一脆弱性评估
持续、全面的漏洞管理对管理员来说是一项艰巨的任务。困难并不是因为缺乏工具,而是因为它们在设计时没有考虑面向服务的体系结构观点,而且缺乏可信的机器可读输入数据。提出了一种基于开放安全标准及相关内容的面向服务的漏洞评估体系结构。如果将这些功能作为服务提供,那么各种安全应用程序可以以松耦合的方式进行互操作和集成。我们还研究了用于自动脆弱性评估的可用公共数据的有效性。尽管在描述符合OVAL标准的机读评估测试方面做了大量的工作,但评估结果不足以进行全面的脆弱性评估。现有OVAL测试只覆盖了所有已知漏洞的12%,而前30名中最独特漏洞的一些流行客户端应用程序覆盖了90%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Patrol Guidance Mechanism in a Context-Aware Environment Investigating the Relevance of Linked Open Data Sets with SPARQL Queries A Distributed Protective Approach for Multiechelon Supply Systems Model Checking for SpaceWire Link Interface Design Using Uppaal An Optimal Route Selection Mechanism for Outbound Connection on IPv6 Site Multihoming Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1