Comparison of Wind Scenarios Generation Methods-A Case Study From Ecuador

Julio Cuenca Tinitana, F. Palacios
{"title":"Comparison of Wind Scenarios Generation Methods-A Case Study From Ecuador","authors":"Julio Cuenca Tinitana, F. Palacios","doi":"10.1109/CCAC.2019.8920861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wind scenarios generation is a critical instrument for power systems scheduling and planning. Therefore, reliable approach methods are required to address this issue. This paper analyzes three scenarios generation methods accuracy to represent wind variability. For this purpose, a wind speed database of the Villonaco wind farm located in Loja-Ecuador is analyzed. The wind speed is characterized, and the generation of scenarios is performed through methods based on ARMA models, Monte Carlo, and Moment-Matching techniques. Quality analysis of the scenarios generated is carried out using Weibull probability plots, Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit test, and error analysis. It is found that the set of scenarios generated by the Monte Carlo method evidence better performance when both Weibull probability plots and Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit test are analyzed. However, set based on the ARMA model exhibit lower Root Mean Squared and Mean Absolute errors. Finally, the wind speed sets are transformed into wind power scenarios considering the power curve and characteristics of the wind turbines.","PeriodicalId":184764,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2019.8920861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Wind scenarios generation is a critical instrument for power systems scheduling and planning. Therefore, reliable approach methods are required to address this issue. This paper analyzes three scenarios generation methods accuracy to represent wind variability. For this purpose, a wind speed database of the Villonaco wind farm located in Loja-Ecuador is analyzed. The wind speed is characterized, and the generation of scenarios is performed through methods based on ARMA models, Monte Carlo, and Moment-Matching techniques. Quality analysis of the scenarios generated is carried out using Weibull probability plots, Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit test, and error analysis. It is found that the set of scenarios generated by the Monte Carlo method evidence better performance when both Weibull probability plots and Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit test are analyzed. However, set based on the ARMA model exhibit lower Root Mean Squared and Mean Absolute errors. Finally, the wind speed sets are transformed into wind power scenarios considering the power curve and characteristics of the wind turbines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风电情景发电方法的比较——以厄瓜多尔为例
风电情景生成是电力系统调度和规划的重要工具。因此,需要可靠的接近方法来解决这个问题。本文分析了三种情景生成方法表征风变率的准确性。为此,对位于厄瓜多尔洛哈的Villonaco风电场的风速数据库进行了分析。通过ARMA模型、Monte Carlo和矩匹配技术对风速进行了表征,并进行了场景的生成。使用威布尔概率图、Kolmogorov-Smirnov拟合优度检验和误差分析对生成的场景进行质量分析。通过对威布尔概率图和Kolmogorov-Smirnov拟合优度检验的分析,发现蒙特卡罗方法生成的场景集具有更好的性能。然而,基于ARMA模型的集合显示出更低的均方根和平均绝对误差。最后,结合风力机的功率曲线和特性,将风速集转换为风力发电场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of an Impulsive Offset-Free MHE/ZMPC Scheme For Type 1 Diabetes Treatment CCAC 2019 Preconference Workshops CCAC 2019 Copyright Page Optimal Assignment of Resources for Distributed Computing in Real-Time Applications A Class of Continuous Predefined-Time Controllers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1