CEO Presence on the Compensation Committee: A Puzzle

G. Boyle, Helen Roberts
{"title":"CEO Presence on the Compensation Committee: A Puzzle","authors":"G. Boyle, Helen Roberts","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1650826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The managerial power view of executive compensation suggests that CEO membership of the compensation committee is an open invitation to rent extraction by self-serving executives. However, using data from New Zealand – where CEO compensation committee membership was relatively common until quite recently – we find that annual pay increments for CEOs with this apparent advantage averaged four percentage points less than those enjoyed by other CEOs during the 1998–2005 period. This puzzling result cannot be explained by omitted governance variables, risk-return tradeoff considerations, selection bias, or compensation mis-measurement. We find some weak evidence suggesting it may be consistent with a form of optimal contracting.","PeriodicalId":417524,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1650826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The managerial power view of executive compensation suggests that CEO membership of the compensation committee is an open invitation to rent extraction by self-serving executives. However, using data from New Zealand – where CEO compensation committee membership was relatively common until quite recently – we find that annual pay increments for CEOs with this apparent advantage averaged four percentage points less than those enjoyed by other CEOs during the 1998–2005 period. This puzzling result cannot be explained by omitted governance variables, risk-return tradeoff considerations, selection bias, or compensation mis-measurement. We find some weak evidence suggesting it may be consistent with a form of optimal contracting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CEO出席薪酬委员会:一个谜
高管薪酬的管理权力观表明,CEO薪酬委员会的成员资格是对自私自利的高管收取租金的公开邀请。然而,我们利用新西兰的数据发现,在1998年至2005年期间,拥有这种明显优势的首席执行官的年薪酬增幅平均比其他首席执行官低4个百分点。直到最近,新西兰的首席执行官薪酬委员会成员才相对普遍。这个令人困惑的结果不能用省略的治理变量、风险回报权衡、选择偏差或补偿测量错误来解释。我们发现一些薄弱的证据表明,它可能与一种形式的最优收缩一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technological Capacity and Firms' Recovery from COVID-19 Gender and Firm Performance around the World: The Roles of Finance, Technology, and Labor Does Foreign Investment Raise Firm Innovation? Islamic Financing Initiatives Stimulating SMEs Creation in Muslim Countries Government Subsidy Dependence and Stock Price Crash Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1