Affect, judgment and decision making: Some inspirations for bipolar querying

J. Kacprzyk, S. Zadrożny
{"title":"Affect, judgment and decision making: Some inspirations for bipolar querying","authors":"J. Kacprzyk, S. Zadrożny","doi":"10.1109/FOCI.2011.5949480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of a bipolar query, meant as a database query that involves both positive and negative conditions is discussed from the point of view of flexible database querying. A new possible perspective is outlined which is related to the modeling of affects that play a crucial role in real world human centric decision making, and are also known to involve a positive and negative valuation which are the crucial elements of bipolar queries. The aggregation of the matching degrees against the negative and positive conditions to derive an overall matching degree is considered taking into account the Lacroix and Lavency approach [1] for bipolar queries as the point of departure. It is shown that the use of a multiple valued logic based formalism for the representation of positive and negative evaluations boils down to a logical type evaluation function that is in line with Grabisch, Greco and Pirlot's [2] general approach to bivariate bipolar multicriteria decision making. Then, an affective computing perspective - in its affect and judgment related setting that is decision making oriented - is outlined and advocated.","PeriodicalId":106271,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence (FOCI)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence (FOCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCI.2011.5949480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The concept of a bipolar query, meant as a database query that involves both positive and negative conditions is discussed from the point of view of flexible database querying. A new possible perspective is outlined which is related to the modeling of affects that play a crucial role in real world human centric decision making, and are also known to involve a positive and negative valuation which are the crucial elements of bipolar queries. The aggregation of the matching degrees against the negative and positive conditions to derive an overall matching degree is considered taking into account the Lacroix and Lavency approach [1] for bipolar queries as the point of departure. It is shown that the use of a multiple valued logic based formalism for the representation of positive and negative evaluations boils down to a logical type evaluation function that is in line with Grabisch, Greco and Pirlot's [2] general approach to bivariate bipolar multicriteria decision making. Then, an affective computing perspective - in its affect and judgment related setting that is decision making oriented - is outlined and advocated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感、判断和决策:对双相查询的一些启示
从灵活的数据库查询的角度讨论了双极查询的概念,即涉及积极和消极条件的数据库查询。概述了一种新的可能的观点,它与影响的建模有关,这些影响在现实世界中以人为中心的决策中起着至关重要的作用,并且也已知涉及积极和消极的评估,这是双极查询的关键要素。考虑到双极查询的Lacroix和Lavency方法[1]作为出发点,考虑了针对消极和积极条件的匹配度的聚合,以得出总体匹配度。研究表明,使用基于多值逻辑的形式主义来表示正面和负面评价可以归结为一个逻辑类型评价函数,该函数符合Grabisch, Greco和Pirlot[2]的二元双极多标准决策的一般方法。然后,情感计算的观点-在其影响和判断相关的设置是决策导向-概述和提倡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Test error bounds for classifiers: A survey of old and new results Bistable memory and binary counters in spiking neural network Decision making with probabilities, weighted averages and OWA operators Fuzzy rule based networks On the use of fuzzy stable models for inconsistent classical logic programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1