Exposure to psychosocial risks at work in prisons: does contact with inmates matter? A pilot study among prison workers in Spain.

A. Ghaddar, E. Ronda, A. Nolasco, Nahum Álvares, I. Mateo
{"title":"Exposure to psychosocial risks at work in prisons: does contact with inmates matter? A pilot study among prison workers in Spain.","authors":"A. Ghaddar, E. Ronda, A. Nolasco, Nahum Álvares, I. Mateo","doi":"10.1002/smi.1322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has lately increased its focus on work conditions as predictors of stress among prison workers but only few studies have focused on how the exposure of workers to psychosocial risks vary according to their occupational groups and their contact with inmates. Work psychosocial risks (demands, control and social support) were assessed using the Spanish version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire among 164 Spanish prison workers (43 per cent of those surveyed). Regression analysis was used to explore how psychosocial hazards and their combinations (outcome variables) vary according to occupational groups. Results suggest that psychosocial risks were highest among guards that have more contact with inmates. Implications of the findings for policy making and practice application are discussed.","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Research has lately increased its focus on work conditions as predictors of stress among prison workers but only few studies have focused on how the exposure of workers to psychosocial risks vary according to their occupational groups and their contact with inmates. Work psychosocial risks (demands, control and social support) were assessed using the Spanish version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire among 164 Spanish prison workers (43 per cent of those surveyed). Regression analysis was used to explore how psychosocial hazards and their combinations (outcome variables) vary according to occupational groups. Results suggest that psychosocial risks were highest among guards that have more contact with inmates. Implications of the findings for policy making and practice application are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱工作中暴露于社会心理风险:与囚犯接触重要吗?西班牙监狱工作人员的试点研究。
最近的研究增加了对工作条件的关注,将其作为监狱工作人员压力的预测因素,但很少有研究关注工作人员面临的心理社会风险如何因其职业群体和与囚犯的接触而有所不同。对164名西班牙监狱工作人员(占被调查者的43%)使用西班牙版哥本哈根社会心理问卷评估了工作的社会心理风险(要求、控制和社会支持)。使用回归分析来探讨社会心理危害及其组合(结果变量)如何根据职业群体而变化。结果表明,与囚犯接触较多的狱警的心理风险最高。本文还讨论了研究结果对政策制定和实践应用的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of alexithymia in suicide ideation among Taiwanese army military personnel: A serial mediation model investigating the effects of perceived stress and depression. Ageist attitudes and psychological distress in older adults: The moderating role of reflective functioning. Relationship between stigma and infertility-related stress among couples undergoing AID: The mediating role of communication patterns. Longitudinal mediation effect of hassles between neuroticism and dimensions of the tripartite model in college students. Unravelling the link between sleep and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1