Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Oedema: Is It Safe?

Kuan Hao Yee, S. Sanjay
{"title":"Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Oedema: Is It Safe?","authors":"Kuan Hao Yee, S. Sanjay","doi":"10.33590/emjdiabet/10314891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been increasingly used in the management of various retinal diseases, especially diabetic macular oedema. Diabetic macular oedema is one of the leading causes of legal blindness among patients with diabetic retinopathy, meaning these patients are eligible for associated medical benefits. It is essential that diabetic macular oedema is managed with an effective and safe treatment for good long-term prognosis. Over the past decade, focal/grid laser photocoagulation has been the gold standard treatment. However, evidence supporting the superior clinical benefits and relative safety of anti-VEGF agents has driven a recent shift in treatment paradigm, favouring anti-VEGF over laser treatment. Previous studies involving systemic anti-VEGF treatment in cancers have identified an associated increased risk of arteriothrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, which are potentially fatal. Hence, it is important to evaluate whether such risks, which will significantly alter the safety profile, persist with intravitreal administration. A comprehensive literature review was performed and concluded that no significant increase in risk of ocular or non-ocular adverse events, particularly arteriothrombotic events, were associated with anti-VEGF agents, predicting an overall favourable safety profile. A summary of some of the possible adverse events recorded in the various studies, albeit at relatively low rates, are also included. Additionally, it is briefly discussed how real-world concerns of cost and affordability can influence treatment choice, thereby affecting how clinical evidence is transferred into practice.","PeriodicalId":418035,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Diabetes","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10314891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the last decade, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been increasingly used in the management of various retinal diseases, especially diabetic macular oedema. Diabetic macular oedema is one of the leading causes of legal blindness among patients with diabetic retinopathy, meaning these patients are eligible for associated medical benefits. It is essential that diabetic macular oedema is managed with an effective and safe treatment for good long-term prognosis. Over the past decade, focal/grid laser photocoagulation has been the gold standard treatment. However, evidence supporting the superior clinical benefits and relative safety of anti-VEGF agents has driven a recent shift in treatment paradigm, favouring anti-VEGF over laser treatment. Previous studies involving systemic anti-VEGF treatment in cancers have identified an associated increased risk of arteriothrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, which are potentially fatal. Hence, it is important to evaluate whether such risks, which will significantly alter the safety profile, persist with intravitreal administration. A comprehensive literature review was performed and concluded that no significant increase in risk of ocular or non-ocular adverse events, particularly arteriothrombotic events, were associated with anti-VEGF agents, predicting an overall favourable safety profile. A summary of some of the possible adverse events recorded in the various studies, albeit at relatively low rates, are also included. Additionally, it is briefly discussed how real-world concerns of cost and affordability can influence treatment choice, thereby affecting how clinical evidence is transferred into practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿安全吗?
在过去的十年中,玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物越来越多地用于各种视网膜疾病的治疗,特别是糖尿病性黄斑水肿。糖尿病性黄斑水肿是糖尿病视网膜病变患者致盲的主要原因之一,这意味着这些患者有资格享受相关的医疗福利。对糖尿病性黄斑水肿进行有效和安全的治疗以获得良好的长期预后是至关重要的。在过去的十年中,焦点/网格激光光凝一直是金标准治疗。然而,支持抗vegf药物优越的临床益处和相对安全性的证据推动了最近治疗模式的转变,倾向于抗vegf而不是激光治疗。先前的研究涉及癌症的全身抗vegf治疗,已经确定了相关的动脉血栓形成事件的风险增加,如心肌梗死和中风,这可能是致命的。因此,评估这种会显著改变安全性的风险是否持续玻璃体内给药是很重要的。进行了全面的文献回顾,并得出结论:眼部或非眼部不良事件的风险没有显著增加,特别是动脉血栓形成事件,与抗vegf药物相关,预测总体上有利的安全性。本文还包括了各种研究中记录的一些可能的不良事件的总结,尽管发生率相对较低。此外,本文还简要讨论了现实世界对成本和负担能力的关注如何影响治疗选择,从而影响临床证据如何转化为实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of the 59th European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Annual Meeting Preconception Care for Individuals with Diabetes EASD 2023 Abstract Highlights Hidden Complication of Obesity and Diabetes: Is It Time to Put More Focus on Fatty Liver? Mean Platelet Volume in Type 2 Diabetes: Correlation with Poor Glycaemic Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1