Rethinking Libertarianism: A Review Essay on Elizabeth Anderson’s ‘Private Government’

D. Ellerman
{"title":"Rethinking Libertarianism: A Review Essay on Elizabeth Anderson’s ‘Private Government’","authors":"D. Ellerman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3077038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In her recent book Private Government, Elizabeth Anderson makes a powerful but pragmatic case against the abuses experienced by employees in conventional corporations. The purpose of this review-essay is to contrast Anderson’s pragmatic critique of many abuses in the employment relation with a principled critique of the employment relationship itself. This principled critique is based on the theory of inalienable rights that descends from the Reformation doctrine of the inalienability of conscience down through the Enlightenment in the abolitionist, democratic, and feminist movements. That theory was the basis for the abolition of the voluntary slavery or self-sale contract, the voluntary non-democratic constitution (pactum subjectionis), and the voluntary coverture marriage contract in today’s democratic countries. When understood in modern terms, that same theory applies as well against the voluntary self-rental or employment contract that is the basis for our current economic system.","PeriodicalId":408879,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Economics eJournal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3077038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In her recent book Private Government, Elizabeth Anderson makes a powerful but pragmatic case against the abuses experienced by employees in conventional corporations. The purpose of this review-essay is to contrast Anderson’s pragmatic critique of many abuses in the employment relation with a principled critique of the employment relationship itself. This principled critique is based on the theory of inalienable rights that descends from the Reformation doctrine of the inalienability of conscience down through the Enlightenment in the abolitionist, democratic, and feminist movements. That theory was the basis for the abolition of the voluntary slavery or self-sale contract, the voluntary non-democratic constitution (pactum subjectionis), and the voluntary coverture marriage contract in today’s democratic countries. When understood in modern terms, that same theory applies as well against the voluntary self-rental or employment contract that is the basis for our current economic system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考自由意志主义:伊丽莎白·安德森《私人政府》述评
伊丽莎白•安德森(Elizabeth Anderson)在她的新书《私人政府》(Private Government)中,针对传统企业员工所遭受的虐待,提出了一个有力而务实的案例。这篇评论文章的目的是将安德森对雇佣关系中许多滥用行为的实用主义批评与对雇佣关系本身的原则性批评进行对比。这种原则性的批判是建立在不可剥夺权利理论的基础上的,这种不可剥夺权利理论起源于宗教改革时期关于良心不可剥夺的教义,一直延续到废奴主义、民主主义和女权主义运动中的启蒙运动。这一理论是废除自愿奴役或自我买卖合同、自愿非民主宪法(pactum subjectionis)和自愿包换婚姻合同在当今民主国家的基础。如果用现代术语来理解,同样的理论也适用于作为我们当前经济体系基础的自愿自租或雇佣合同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Machine Learning to Measure Conservatism Export Guarantees and Firm Performance in the Context of Corporate Governance Innovation in Times of Global Pandemic and the Debate on the Company Purpose Benefits of Having a Female CFO The Competitive Effects of Mergers with Cournot Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1