Judicial independence and the enforcement of the constitution in Lesotho

N. Mahao
{"title":"Judicial independence and the enforcement of the constitution in Lesotho","authors":"N. Mahao","doi":"10.1080/14760400508522900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article assesses the performance of the superior courts in Lesotho in their duty to uphold the constitution. Since it is axiomatic that the courts’ ability in this regard is necessarily intertwined with their institutional independence, the twists and turns that characterise the trajectory of the development of a fully‐fledged concept of judicial independence in Lesotho are traced. While the judiciary evolved slowly from within the executive during a good part of the colonial period, it received full institutional independence under the 1965/66 Constitutions and, in addition to this, it was bestowed with a broad jurisdictional competence under the 1993 Constitution. By and large, constitutional cases against the executive disposed of in the post‐1993 era reflect that, using its institutional independence as a basis, the judiciary has provided a solid and effective check and balance role to the executive, thereby living up to its mandate to uphold the Constitution and ensure the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":107403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760400508522900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article assesses the performance of the superior courts in Lesotho in their duty to uphold the constitution. Since it is axiomatic that the courts’ ability in this regard is necessarily intertwined with their institutional independence, the twists and turns that characterise the trajectory of the development of a fully‐fledged concept of judicial independence in Lesotho are traced. While the judiciary evolved slowly from within the executive during a good part of the colonial period, it received full institutional independence under the 1965/66 Constitutions and, in addition to this, it was bestowed with a broad jurisdictional competence under the 1993 Constitution. By and large, constitutional cases against the executive disposed of in the post‐1993 era reflect that, using its institutional independence as a basis, the judiciary has provided a solid and effective check and balance role to the executive, thereby living up to its mandate to uphold the Constitution and ensure the rule of law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文评估了莱索托高级法院在维护宪法方面的表现。由于法院在这方面的能力必然与其机构独立性交织在一起,这是不言自明的,因此可以追溯莱索托完全成熟的司法独立概念发展轨迹的曲折。虽然在殖民时期的大部分时间里,司法机关从行政机关内部缓慢发展,但根据1965/66年《宪法》,它获得了充分的机构独立性,除此之外,根据1993年《宪法》,它被赋予了广泛的管辖权限。总的来说,1993年后处理的针对行政部门的宪法案件反映出,以其机构独立性为基础,司法部门为行政部门提供了坚实而有效的制衡作用,从而履行了维护宪法和确保法治的职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE CONFUSION IN DEFINING PLAGIARISM IN LEGAL EDUCATION AND LEGAL PRACTICE IN AUSTRALIA The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT WITH A HUMAN RIGHTS TOUCH: FORGING NEW AGENTS FOR CHANGE IN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS BREACH OF TRUST AS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT WHERE DID WE COME FROM? WHERE DO WE GO? AN ENQUIRY INTO THE STUDENTS AND SYSTEMS OF LEGAL EDUCATION IN INDIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1