Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing for The Selection of Web-Based Beef Cattle Feed Composition

H. Jayadianti, Nurheri Cahyana, Wahyu Garuda Kusuma, A. H. Pratomo, Heryanto
{"title":"Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing for The Selection of Web-Based Beef Cattle Feed Composition","authors":"H. Jayadianti, Nurheri Cahyana, Wahyu Garuda Kusuma, A. H. Pratomo, Heryanto","doi":"10.1109/ICSITech49800.2020.9392054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nutritional requirements for the fattening process in each beef cattle differ according to body weight and body weight gain targets. Inappropriate feed composition can be detrimental to breeders because the bodyweight gain target is not achieved, and improper expenditure of feed funds. Genetic algorithms can be used to search for feed composition solutions, where the nutrients produced are close to the nutrients needed by beef cattle. Genetic algorithms have several disadvantages, one of which often occurs premature convergence, where genetic operators cannot produce offspring better than their parents. Premature convergence on genetic algorithms can be overcome by hybridizing local search algorithms, one of which is Simulated Annealing. Simulated Annealing is a local search algorithm that functions as a counterweight to genetic algorithms, where genetic algorithms are able to explore global areas, while simulated Annealing is able to exploit local areas. Comparative testing of hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated Annealing with a simple genetic algorithm shows that the fitness value of the hybridization method is better than the simple genetic algorithm. The best fitness of the hybridization method is 0.15934987829563, and the best fitness is a simple genetic algorithm of 0.15869962195529. The hybridization method produces better fitness because of the role of simulated Annealing in exploiting individuals on genetic algorithms so that the composition of feed solutions can be closer to the optimal solution.","PeriodicalId":408532,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech49800.2020.9392054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nutritional requirements for the fattening process in each beef cattle differ according to body weight and body weight gain targets. Inappropriate feed composition can be detrimental to breeders because the bodyweight gain target is not achieved, and improper expenditure of feed funds. Genetic algorithms can be used to search for feed composition solutions, where the nutrients produced are close to the nutrients needed by beef cattle. Genetic algorithms have several disadvantages, one of which often occurs premature convergence, where genetic operators cannot produce offspring better than their parents. Premature convergence on genetic algorithms can be overcome by hybridizing local search algorithms, one of which is Simulated Annealing. Simulated Annealing is a local search algorithm that functions as a counterweight to genetic algorithms, where genetic algorithms are able to explore global areas, while simulated Annealing is able to exploit local areas. Comparative testing of hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated Annealing with a simple genetic algorithm shows that the fitness value of the hybridization method is better than the simple genetic algorithm. The best fitness of the hybridization method is 0.15934987829563, and the best fitness is a simple genetic algorithm of 0.15869962195529. The hybridization method produces better fitness because of the role of simulated Annealing in exploiting individuals on genetic algorithms so that the composition of feed solutions can be closer to the optimal solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于网络的肉牛饲料成分选择的混合遗传算法和模拟退火
每种肉牛在育肥过程中的营养需求根据其体重和增重目标而有所不同。不适当的饲料成分会对种猪造成不利影响,因为增重目标无法实现,饲料资金的支出也不合理。遗传算法可以用来搜索饲料组成的解决方案,其中产生的营养物质接近肉牛所需的营养物质。遗传算法有几个缺点,其中一个缺点是遗传算子经常出现过早收敛,即遗传算子不能产生比其亲代更好的后代。混合局部搜索算法可以克服遗传算法的早熟收敛性,其中一种是模拟退火算法。模拟退火是一种局部搜索算法,作为遗传算法的平衡,遗传算法能够探索全局区域,而模拟退火能够利用局部区域。用简单遗传算法对混合遗传算法和模拟退火算法进行对比测试,结果表明,混合遗传算法的适应度值优于简单遗传算法。杂交方法的最佳适应度为0.15934987829563,简单遗传算法的最佳适应度为0.15869962195529。由于模拟退火在遗传算法中对个体的利用作用,杂交方法具有较好的适应度,使饲料解的组成更接近最优解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Long Short Term Memory Implemented for Rainfall Forecasting A Comparative Analysis of QoS parameters measurement applying packet scheduling algorithms on Cisco 2800 Router with Static Routing A Review of Intrusion Detection System in IoT with Machine Learning Approach: Current and Future Research Face Skin Disease Detection with Textural Feature Extraction Cleavage self : a new concept in reproduction stage of genetic algorithm for rainfall prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1