SAAM: a method for analyzing the properties of software architectures

R. Kazman, L. Bass, Mike Webb, G. Abowd
{"title":"SAAM: a method for analyzing the properties of software architectures","authors":"R. Kazman, L. Bass, Mike Webb, G. Abowd","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.1994.296768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While software architecture has become an increasingly important research topic in recent years, insufficient attention has been paid to methods for evaluation of these architectures. Evaluating architectures is difficult for two main reasons. First, there is no common language used to describe different architectures. Second, there is no clear way of understanding an architecture with respect to an organization's life cycle concerns -software quality concerns such as maintainability portability, modularity, reusability, and so forth. We address these shortcomings by describing three perspectives by which we can understand the description of a software architecture and then proposing a five-step method for analyzing software architectures called SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method). We illustrate the method by analyzing three separate user interface architectures with respect to the quality of modifiability.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":432962,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"690","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.1994.296768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 690

Abstract

While software architecture has become an increasingly important research topic in recent years, insufficient attention has been paid to methods for evaluation of these architectures. Evaluating architectures is difficult for two main reasons. First, there is no common language used to describe different architectures. Second, there is no clear way of understanding an architecture with respect to an organization's life cycle concerns -software quality concerns such as maintainability portability, modularity, reusability, and so forth. We address these shortcomings by describing three perspectives by which we can understand the description of a software architecture and then proposing a five-step method for analyzing software architectures called SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method). We illustrate the method by analyzing three separate user interface architectures with respect to the quality of modifiability.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SAAM:一种分析软件架构属性的方法
近年来,软件体系结构已成为一个越来越重要的研究课题,但对软件体系结构的评估方法却缺乏足够的重视。评估体系结构很困难,主要有两个原因。首先,没有用于描述不同体系结构的通用语言。其次,没有一种清晰的方法可以根据组织的生命周期关注——软件质量关注,如可维护性、可移植性、模块化、可重用性等等——来理解体系结构。我们通过描述可以理解软件体系结构描述的三个视角来解决这些缺点,然后提出一个分析软件体系结构的五步方法,称为SAAM(软件体系结构分析方法)。我们通过分析关于可修改性质量的三个独立的用户界面架构来说明该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An instrumented approach to improving software quality through formal technical review Software reuse myths revisited Software reuse - facts and myths Distributed software engineering Understanding "why" in software process modelling, analysis, and design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1