Direito à saúde no Brasil: parâmetros normativos para densificação de um conteúdo mínimo

L. A. Almeida
{"title":"Direito à saúde no Brasil: parâmetros normativos para densificação de um conteúdo mínimo","authors":"L. A. Almeida","doi":"10.18593/ejjl.19621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judicialization of the right to health is a growing phenomenon in Brazil. The hard cases deal with medicaments and treatments not included in public policies of Brazilian’s health system, subject that was adressed by Brazilian Supreme Court in “Recurso Extraordinário” n. 566.471/RN. The judicial answer will be constructed by balancing, which demands an analytical structure offered by proportionality and its tests. However, for further legal rationality achieved by further objectification of the balancing, it is important to include the minimum core – standard that defines the intensity of deference and State’s argumentative onus. In this line, using the technical-legal method, the article offers the normative patterns that helps in the definition of the minimum core of right to health in Brazil. Before this, notwithstanding, it will be necessary to examine the comprehension of the minimum core professed by United Nations’ Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.","PeriodicalId":206661,"journal":{"name":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.19621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The judicialization of the right to health is a growing phenomenon in Brazil. The hard cases deal with medicaments and treatments not included in public policies of Brazilian’s health system, subject that was adressed by Brazilian Supreme Court in “Recurso Extraordinário” n. 566.471/RN. The judicial answer will be constructed by balancing, which demands an analytical structure offered by proportionality and its tests. However, for further legal rationality achieved by further objectification of the balancing, it is important to include the minimum core – standard that defines the intensity of deference and State’s argumentative onus. In this line, using the technical-legal method, the article offers the normative patterns that helps in the definition of the minimum core of right to health in Brazil. Before this, notwithstanding, it will be necessary to examine the comprehension of the minimum core professed by United Nations’ Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西的健康权:加强最低内容的规范性参数
在巴西,健康权的司法化日益成为一种现象。疑难案件涉及巴西卫生系统公共政策中未包括的药物和治疗,巴西最高法院在" Recurso Extraordinário "第566.471/RN号文件中处理了这一问题。司法答案将通过平衡来构建,这需要一种由相称性及其检验提供的分析结构。然而,为了通过进一步客观化平衡来实现进一步的法律合理性,重要的是要包括定义服从强度和国家辩论责任的最低核心标准。在这方面,本文采用技术-法律方法,提供了有助于界定巴西健康权最低核心的规范模式。然而,在此之前,有必要审查一下对联合国经济、社会和文化权利委员会所承认的最低核心的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORAÇÃO, CULTURA CIENTÍFICA NO BRASIL E OS 20 ANOS DA EJJL O direito fundamental a tratamento não discriminatório como limite para a extinção do contrato de emprego da pessoa com doença geradora de estigma ou preconceito Cuidado e direitos fundamentais: o caso do habeas corpus coletivo para pais e responsáveis por crianças e pessoas com deficiência Los derechos de la naturaleza: un paso adelante, tres atrás O debate entre Mart Suzi (IBF) e Robert Alexy (WF), organizado na obra proporcionalidade e internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1