Corruption as a Violation of International Human Rights

Anne Peters
{"title":"Corruption as a Violation of International Human Rights","authors":"Anne Peters","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2805099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a fact that states with a high corruption rate (or a high corruption perception) are at the same time those with a poor human rights record. Beyond this coincidence, the paper seeks to identify a concrete legal relationship between corruption and deficient human rights protection. This is in practical terms relevant, because the extant international norms against corruption have so far yielded only modest success; their implementation could be improved with the help of human rights arguments and instruments.This paper therefore discusses a dual question: Can corrupt behaviour be conceptualised as a human rights violation? Should it be categorised and sanctioned as a human rights violation? My answer is that such a reconceptualization is legally sound, and that its normative and practical benefits outweigh the risk of reinforcing the anti-Western skepticism towards the fight against corruption. This assessment leads to the practice recommendation of a mutual mainstreaming of the international anti-corruption and human rights procedures. I conclude that the re-framing of corruption not only as a human right issue but as a potential human rights violation can contribute to closing the implementation gap of the international anti-corruption instruments.","PeriodicalId":131289,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: Laws","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2805099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

It is a fact that states with a high corruption rate (or a high corruption perception) are at the same time those with a poor human rights record. Beyond this coincidence, the paper seeks to identify a concrete legal relationship between corruption and deficient human rights protection. This is in practical terms relevant, because the extant international norms against corruption have so far yielded only modest success; their implementation could be improved with the help of human rights arguments and instruments.This paper therefore discusses a dual question: Can corrupt behaviour be conceptualised as a human rights violation? Should it be categorised and sanctioned as a human rights violation? My answer is that such a reconceptualization is legally sound, and that its normative and practical benefits outweigh the risk of reinforcing the anti-Western skepticism towards the fight against corruption. This assessment leads to the practice recommendation of a mutual mainstreaming of the international anti-corruption and human rights procedures. I conclude that the re-framing of corruption not only as a human right issue but as a potential human rights violation can contribute to closing the implementation gap of the international anti-corruption instruments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腐败是对国际人权的侵犯
事实是,腐败率高(或腐败观念高)的国家同时也是人权记录较差的国家。除了这种巧合之外,本文还试图找出腐败与缺乏人权保护之间的具体法律关系。这在实际意义上是相关的,因为现有的反腐败国际准则迄今只取得了有限的成功;在人权论点和文书的帮助下,它们的执行可以得到改善。因此,本文讨论了一个双重问题:腐败行为能否被概念化为侵犯人权?它是否应该被归类为侵犯人权并受到制裁?我的回答是,这种重新概念化在法律上是合理的,其规范和实际的好处超过了加强对反腐败斗争的反西方怀疑的风险。这一评估导致了将国际反腐败和人权程序相互纳入主流的实践建议。我的结论是,重新界定腐败不仅是一个人权问题,而且是一种潜在的侵犯人权行为,可以有助于缩小国际反腐败文书的执行差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Law of State Responsibility and COVID-19: an Ideology Critique Deferred Pay in Financial Services: Compliance, Productivity and Attracting Talent International Investment Law and Domestic Investment Rules: Tracing the Upstream and Downstream Flows On The Contribution of Investment Arbitration to Issues of Evidence and Procedure Before Other International Courts and Tribunals Human Rights Issues in Cameroon in the Case of the Independentists Arrested in Nigeria and Extradited to Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1