Recovering Global Supply Chains from Sourcing Interruptions: The Role of Sourcing Strategy

Nitish Jain, Karan Girotra, Serguei Netessine
{"title":"Recovering Global Supply Chains from Sourcing Interruptions: The Role of Sourcing Strategy","authors":"Nitish Jain, Karan Girotra, Serguei Netessine","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2682522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Fast recovery from sourcing interruptions is a key objective for global supply chains and for business continuity professionals. In this paper, we study the impact of different supply chain strategies—supplier diversification and the use of long-term relationships—on the ability of a supply chain to recover from sourcing interruptions. Academic/practical relevance: Improving supply chains’ recovery ability has been an important focus area for both practitioners and academics. Collectively, available anecdotal evidence and theoretical analyses provide ambiguous recommendations driven by competing effects of different sourcing strategies. Our paper provides the first rigorous and large-scale empirical evidence relating the use of different supply chain strategies to the ability of a supply chain to recover from supply interruptions. Methodology: We develop a compound estimator of a supply chain’s recovery rate that can be constructed using limited available data (only the time series of firms’ actual sourcing behavior). Using more than two and half million import manifests, we extract firms’ maritime sourcing transactions and use this data to estimate recovery rates of different firm-category supply chains of publicly traded U.S. firms. Results: We find that supplier diversification is associated with slower recovery from sourcing interruptions, whereas the use of long-term relationships is associated with faster recovery. A one standard deviation decrease in the former is associated with a 16% faster recovery, and a like increase in the latter is associated with a 20% faster recovery. Managerial implications: Our paper brings important empirical evidence to the hitherto theoretical debate on the impact of sourcing strategies on faster recovery in supply chains. We therefore provide actionable advice on supply chain design for faster recovery.","PeriodicalId":414091,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Science eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Problem definition: Fast recovery from sourcing interruptions is a key objective for global supply chains and for business continuity professionals. In this paper, we study the impact of different supply chain strategies—supplier diversification and the use of long-term relationships—on the ability of a supply chain to recover from sourcing interruptions. Academic/practical relevance: Improving supply chains’ recovery ability has been an important focus area for both practitioners and academics. Collectively, available anecdotal evidence and theoretical analyses provide ambiguous recommendations driven by competing effects of different sourcing strategies. Our paper provides the first rigorous and large-scale empirical evidence relating the use of different supply chain strategies to the ability of a supply chain to recover from supply interruptions. Methodology: We develop a compound estimator of a supply chain’s recovery rate that can be constructed using limited available data (only the time series of firms’ actual sourcing behavior). Using more than two and half million import manifests, we extract firms’ maritime sourcing transactions and use this data to estimate recovery rates of different firm-category supply chains of publicly traded U.S. firms. Results: We find that supplier diversification is associated with slower recovery from sourcing interruptions, whereas the use of long-term relationships is associated with faster recovery. A one standard deviation decrease in the former is associated with a 16% faster recovery, and a like increase in the latter is associated with a 20% faster recovery. Managerial implications: Our paper brings important empirical evidence to the hitherto theoretical debate on the impact of sourcing strategies on faster recovery in supply chains. We therefore provide actionable advice on supply chain design for faster recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从采购中断中恢复全球供应链:采购战略的作用
问题定义:从采购中断中快速恢复是全球供应链和业务连续性专业人员的关键目标。在本文中,我们研究了不同的供应链策略——供应商多样化和长期关系的使用——对供应链从采购中断中恢复的能力的影响。学术/实践相关性:提高供应链的恢复能力一直是从业者和学者关注的重要领域。总的来说,现有的轶事证据和理论分析提供了模棱两可的建议,这些建议是由不同采购策略的竞争效应驱动的。我们的论文提供了第一个严谨和大规模的经验证据,这些证据与使用不同的供应链策略与供应链从供应中断中恢复的能力有关。方法:我们开发了一个供应链回收率的复合估计器,可以使用有限的可用数据(只有公司实际采购行为的时间序列)来构建。使用超过250万份进口清单,我们提取了公司的海上采购交易,并使用这些数据来估计美国上市公司不同公司类别供应链的回收率。结果:我们发现供应商多样化与采购中断后较慢的恢复有关,而长期关系的使用与更快的恢复有关。前者降低一个标准差,采收率提高16%;后者提高一个标准差,采收率提高20%。管理意义:我们的论文为迄今为止关于采购策略对供应链更快恢复的影响的理论辩论提供了重要的经验证据。因此,我们为供应链设计提供可操作的建议,以加快恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating the Costs of Standardization: Evidence from the Movie Industry Does Gender Affect Innovation? Evidence from Female Chief Technology Officers To Interfere or Not To Interfere: Information Revelation and Price-Setting Incentives in a Multiagent Learning Environment Innovation Contests With Risk-Averse Participants Can Deep Reinforcement Learning Improve Inventory Management? Performance on Dual Sourcing, Lost Sales and Multi-Echelon Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1