Effects of Bo's abdominal acupuncture on post-stroke fatigue: A pilot study

Zhen Huang, Jie Zhan, Ruihuan Pan, Youhua Guo, Mingfeng He, Hongxia Chen, Lechang Zhan
{"title":"Effects of Bo's abdominal acupuncture on post-stroke fatigue: A pilot study","authors":"Zhen Huang, Jie Zhan, Ruihuan Pan, Youhua Guo, Mingfeng He, Hongxia Chen, Lechang Zhan","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a frequently reported complication of stroke. The current drugs play a limited effect on PSF. Bo's abdominal acupuncture (BAA) has been used for decades to treat stroke in China, however, few studies have used the western clinical evaluation approach to verify the efficacy of BAA. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of BAA on PSF. Methods: Seventy stroke patients with fatigue were randomly allocated into the BAA group (n=35) or the control group (n=35). Patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment, while patients in the BAA group were given 30 additional minutes of BAA treatment each day. The level of patients' fatigue was evaluated by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the energy domain of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL-E). Besides, the activity of daily living of patients was assessed by Barthel Index (BI). All adverse events were clearly written during the whole trial. Results: 70 patients with PSF accomplished this study. The mean age of patients was 60.7 years and 47 (67%) were males. At baseline, no significant difference can be observed between two groups in FSS, SS-QOL-E, and BI. After 2-week treatment, both groups signified an increase on SS-QOL-E and BI scores, a decrease on FSS scores; and the SS-QOL-E scores of BAA group increased more than that of the control group (p< 0.05), but the changes of FSS and BI scores between two groups had no significant difference after treatment (p> 0.05). Serious adverse events were not reported. Conclusion: This study suggested the integrative program of BAA and conventional rehabilitation treatment maybe more effective in promoting the recovery of PSF. Further explorations on the treatment of PSF are needed.","PeriodicalId":345384,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a frequently reported complication of stroke. The current drugs play a limited effect on PSF. Bo's abdominal acupuncture (BAA) has been used for decades to treat stroke in China, however, few studies have used the western clinical evaluation approach to verify the efficacy of BAA. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of BAA on PSF. Methods: Seventy stroke patients with fatigue were randomly allocated into the BAA group (n=35) or the control group (n=35). Patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment, while patients in the BAA group were given 30 additional minutes of BAA treatment each day. The level of patients' fatigue was evaluated by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the energy domain of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL-E). Besides, the activity of daily living of patients was assessed by Barthel Index (BI). All adverse events were clearly written during the whole trial. Results: 70 patients with PSF accomplished this study. The mean age of patients was 60.7 years and 47 (67%) were males. At baseline, no significant difference can be observed between two groups in FSS, SS-QOL-E, and BI. After 2-week treatment, both groups signified an increase on SS-QOL-E and BI scores, a decrease on FSS scores; and the SS-QOL-E scores of BAA group increased more than that of the control group (p< 0.05), but the changes of FSS and BI scores between two groups had no significant difference after treatment (p> 0.05). Serious adverse events were not reported. Conclusion: This study suggested the integrative program of BAA and conventional rehabilitation treatment maybe more effective in promoting the recovery of PSF. Further explorations on the treatment of PSF are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博氏腹针对脑卒中后疲劳的影响:一项初步研究
背景:卒中后疲劳(PSF)是卒中后常见的并发症。目前的药物对PSF的作用有限。博腹针(BAA)治疗脑卒中在中国已有几十年的历史,但很少有研究采用西方临床评价方法来验证BAA的疗效。目的:探讨BAA治疗PSF的安全性和有效性。方法:70例脑卒中疲乏患者随机分为BAA组(n=35)和对照组(n=35)。对照组患者接受常规康复治疗,BAA组患者每天增加BAA治疗30分钟。采用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和脑卒中特定生活质量能量域量表(SS-QOL-E)评价患者的疲劳水平。采用Barthel指数(Barthel Index, BI)评价患者的日常生活活动能力。在整个试验过程中,所有不良事件都被清楚地记录下来。结果:70例PSF患者完成了本研究。患者平均年龄60.7岁,男性47例(67%)。在基线时,两组间FSS、SS-QOL-E和BI无显著差异。治疗2周后,两组患者SS-QOL-E和BI评分均升高,FSS评分降低;BAA组SS-QOL-E评分高于对照组(p< 0.05),治疗后两组FSS、BI评分变化无显著性差异(p> 0.05)。未见严重不良事件的报道。结论:本研究提示BAA与常规康复治疗相结合可能对促进PSF的康复更有效。PSF的治疗方法有待进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of high performance, grid and cloud computing in high-throughput sequencing A novel algorithm for identifying essential proteins by integrating subcellular localization CNNsite: Prediction of DNA-binding residues in proteins using Convolutional Neural Network with sequence features Inferring Social Influence of anti-Tobacco mass media campaigns Emotion recognition from multi-channel EEG data through Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1