Liquidity and Market Efficiency

Tarun Chordia, Richard Roll, A. Subrahmanyam
{"title":"Liquidity and Market Efficiency","authors":"Tarun Chordia, Richard Roll, A. Subrahmanyam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.794264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market efficiency, the timely incorporation of information into prices, remains a central and controversial issue in finance. The short-horizon predictability of returns from past order flows is an inverse indicator of efficiency. We analyze this predictability for NYSE stocks that traded every day from 1993 through 2002. Mid-quote return predictability is diminished when bid-ask spreads are narrower. Such predictability has declined over time with the minimum tick size. Variance ratios of five-minute and daily returns suggest that prices were closer to random walk benchmarks during decimal regimes than during regimes with higher tick sizes (and wider spreads). These findings support the notion that liquidity stimulates arbitrage activity, which, in turn, enhances market efficiency. Further, as the tick size decreased, open-close/close-open return variance ratios increased, while return autocorrelations decreased. This suggests an increased incorporation of private information into prices during more liquid regimes.","PeriodicalId":447775,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Microstructure","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"871","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Microstructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.794264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 871

Abstract

Market efficiency, the timely incorporation of information into prices, remains a central and controversial issue in finance. The short-horizon predictability of returns from past order flows is an inverse indicator of efficiency. We analyze this predictability for NYSE stocks that traded every day from 1993 through 2002. Mid-quote return predictability is diminished when bid-ask spreads are narrower. Such predictability has declined over time with the minimum tick size. Variance ratios of five-minute and daily returns suggest that prices were closer to random walk benchmarks during decimal regimes than during regimes with higher tick sizes (and wider spreads). These findings support the notion that liquidity stimulates arbitrage activity, which, in turn, enhances market efficiency. Further, as the tick size decreased, open-close/close-open return variance ratios increased, while return autocorrelations decreased. This suggests an increased incorporation of private information into prices during more liquid regimes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动性与市场效率
市场效率,即及时将信息纳入价格,仍然是金融领域的一个核心和有争议的问题。对过去订单流回报的短期可预测性是效率的反向指标。我们分析了纽约证券交易所1993年至2002年间每天交易的股票的这种可预测性。当买卖价差缩小时,中间报价收益的可预测性就会降低。随着时间的推移,这种可预测性随着最小刻度大小而下降。五分钟和每日回报的方差比表明,在十进制制度下,价格比在更高的刻度(和更大的价差)制度下更接近随机游走基准。这些发现支持流动性刺激套利活动的观点,而套利活动反过来又提高了市场效率。此外,随着蜱虫大小的减小,开闭/闭开回报方差比增加,而回报自相关性下降。这表明,在流动性更强的制度下,私人信息被更多地纳入了价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Liquidity Preferences of Mutual Funds Mind the Gap: Disentangling Credit and Liquidity in Risk Spreads Skewness and the Asymmetry in Earnings Announcement Returns The Role of Uninformed Investors in an Optimal IPO Mechanism, or What Google Did Right and Facebook Did Wrong The Impact of Competition and Information on Intraday Trading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1