Analisa Struktur Bangunan Rumah Susun MBR Type – 36 (3 Lantai) Prototype Pada Wilayah Gempa Dan Non Gempa Study Kasus Rusun MBR Pemkab Kotim

Ridho Saleh Silaban
{"title":"Analisa Struktur Bangunan Rumah Susun MBR Type – 36 (3 Lantai) Prototype Pada Wilayah Gempa Dan Non Gempa Study Kasus Rusun MBR Pemkab Kotim","authors":"Ridho Saleh Silaban","doi":"10.33084/mits.v11i1.4221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural design is an important element in a building to produce a strong, safe, and economic structure. The structure is designed according to the needs of the working load. The earthquake area will produce different dimensions of the structure and reinforcement with non-earthquake. This study aims to compare the need for dimensions and reinforcement in earthquake vs non-earthquake areas. The design standard refers to SNI 1727:2013, SNI 2847:2013, SNI 2847-2019, and SNI 1726-2019. The building being studied is a Type 36 MBR Prototype Flat (3 floors) using Fc 25 MPa concrete and Fy 400 MPa reinforcing steel. Research on the upper structure of Columns, Beams, Ring balks, and Floor plates, includes the design of the structural dimensions and reinforcement requirements. The structure's dimensions and the reinforcement area will be designed efficiently and declared safe by controlling the reinforcement ratio (ρ), Limitation of structural dimensions, Capacity Ratio (Pu/ϕ.Pn), and deflection. Analysis of the calculation of the structure using the computer application SAP 2000. The results of the study obtained a comparison of the structural dimensions of the earthquake vs non-earthquake load column with an average of 25.42%, while for the need for the main reinforcement area of 22.50%, the Capacity Ratio value (Pu/ϕ.Pn) between 0.535-0.967. The dimensions of the beam and floor slab structures with an average of 23.84%, while the area of flexural reinforcement (AS) is 20.22%, with a maximum deflection (δ) for all beams and floor slabs with values between 0.13 - 3.70 mm. Comparison for the entire structure the dimensions with an average of 24.63% while the reinforcement is 21.36%.","PeriodicalId":380506,"journal":{"name":"Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33084/mits.v11i1.4221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural design is an important element in a building to produce a strong, safe, and economic structure. The structure is designed according to the needs of the working load. The earthquake area will produce different dimensions of the structure and reinforcement with non-earthquake. This study aims to compare the need for dimensions and reinforcement in earthquake vs non-earthquake areas. The design standard refers to SNI 1727:2013, SNI 2847:2013, SNI 2847-2019, and SNI 1726-2019. The building being studied is a Type 36 MBR Prototype Flat (3 floors) using Fc 25 MPa concrete and Fy 400 MPa reinforcing steel. Research on the upper structure of Columns, Beams, Ring balks, and Floor plates, includes the design of the structural dimensions and reinforcement requirements. The structure's dimensions and the reinforcement area will be designed efficiently and declared safe by controlling the reinforcement ratio (ρ), Limitation of structural dimensions, Capacity Ratio (Pu/ϕ.Pn), and deflection. Analysis of the calculation of the structure using the computer application SAP 2000. The results of the study obtained a comparison of the structural dimensions of the earthquake vs non-earthquake load column with an average of 25.42%, while for the need for the main reinforcement area of 22.50%, the Capacity Ratio value (Pu/ϕ.Pn) between 0.535-0.967. The dimensions of the beam and floor slab structures with an average of 23.84%, while the area of flexural reinforcement (AS) is 20.22%, with a maximum deflection (δ) for all beams and floor slabs with values between 0.13 - 3.70 mm. Comparison for the entire structure the dimensions with an average of 24.63% while the reinforcement is 21.36%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构设计是建筑坚固、安全、经济的重要组成部分。结构是根据工作载荷的需要设计的。震区会产生不同尺寸的结构与非震区的配筋。本研究旨在比较震区与非震区对尺寸和加固的需求。设计标准为SNI 1727:2013、SNI 2847:2013、SNI 2847-2019、SNI 1726-2019。正在研究的建筑是36型MBR原型公寓(3层),使用Fc 25 MPa混凝土和Fy 400 MPa钢筋。对上部结构的柱、梁、环柱和楼板进行了研究,包括结构尺寸和配筋要求的设计。通过控制配筋率(ρ),结构尺寸限制,容量比(Pu/ϕ.Pn)和挠度,可以有效地设计结构尺寸和配筋面积,并宣布其安全。利用计算机应用SAP 2000对结构进行分析计算。研究结果表明,地震荷载柱与非地震荷载柱的结构尺寸比较平均为25.42%,而主加固面积需要为22.50%时,容量比值(Pu/ϕ.Pn)在0.535 ~ 0.967之间。梁和楼板结构的尺寸平均占23.84%,而受弯钢筋面积(AS)占20.22%,所有梁和楼板的最大挠度(δ)在0.13 - 3.70 mm之间。整体结构尺寸平均为24.63%,配筋平均为21.36%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Dampak Lalu Lintas Pasar Ngablak Kabupaten Magelang Pemanfaatan Abu Limbah Bonggol Jagung Sebagai Filler Aspalt Concrete Wearing Cource ( AC-WC ) Analisis Evapotranspirasi Metode Penman Modifikasi Dan Thornthwaite Terhadap Pemodelan Debit Fj. Mock Analisis Model Tarikan Pergerakan Sekolah Di Kota Palangka Raya Hambatan Kontraktor Dalam Penerapan Konsep Green Construction Di Surabaya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1