Reimagining Democratic Inclusion: Asian Americans and the Voting Rights Act

M. Chen, Taeku Lee
{"title":"Reimagining Democratic Inclusion: Asian Americans and the Voting Rights Act","authors":"M. Chen, Taeku Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2097857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current legal framework for protecting voting rights in the United States has been dramatically destabilized by Supreme Court decisions re-interpreting the protections against minority vote dilution and requires rethinking to survive modern challenges. At the same time, the nation has itself undergone dramatic changes in the racial composition of its polity and in the complexity and salience of race as a factor in political life. In this paper, we focus on a relatively unexamined constituent of this complex reality of modern racial diversity that illustrates some of the core features that all minority groups face in continuing VRA challenges: Asian Americans. In the face of apparent political disempowerment, it is curious that Asian Americans have very rarely succeeded in invoking Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a legal measure devised specifically to bolster minority political power. Is this because the necessary conditions for a successful political challenge have not yet arisen? Is the problem a structural one implicating problems in institutional design? Or is it some combination of both, indicating the double harm of a permanent political minority without ability to secure legal redress under the VRA?Social science and legal scholarship suggest that the legal standards used to trigger the special protections of the VRA contain underspecified assumptions about political behavior and oversimplified understandings about racial identity. This paper attempts to mobilize insights about the political behavior of racial minorities in the service of a multi-dimensional approach toward thinking about legal remedies for democratic exclusion. Our core contention is that the problem of democratic exclusion is multi-factorial and requires a multi-pronged approach to redress. Such an approach includes augmenting available data about the political participation of racial minorities, refining empirical measures to reflect racial politics in a complex, multiracial electorate, and revisiting available remedies in light of a problem with both political and legal dimensions.","PeriodicalId":326558,"journal":{"name":"UC Irvine law review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UC Irvine law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2097857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The current legal framework for protecting voting rights in the United States has been dramatically destabilized by Supreme Court decisions re-interpreting the protections against minority vote dilution and requires rethinking to survive modern challenges. At the same time, the nation has itself undergone dramatic changes in the racial composition of its polity and in the complexity and salience of race as a factor in political life. In this paper, we focus on a relatively unexamined constituent of this complex reality of modern racial diversity that illustrates some of the core features that all minority groups face in continuing VRA challenges: Asian Americans. In the face of apparent political disempowerment, it is curious that Asian Americans have very rarely succeeded in invoking Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a legal measure devised specifically to bolster minority political power. Is this because the necessary conditions for a successful political challenge have not yet arisen? Is the problem a structural one implicating problems in institutional design? Or is it some combination of both, indicating the double harm of a permanent political minority without ability to secure legal redress under the VRA?Social science and legal scholarship suggest that the legal standards used to trigger the special protections of the VRA contain underspecified assumptions about political behavior and oversimplified understandings about racial identity. This paper attempts to mobilize insights about the political behavior of racial minorities in the service of a multi-dimensional approach toward thinking about legal remedies for democratic exclusion. Our core contention is that the problem of democratic exclusion is multi-factorial and requires a multi-pronged approach to redress. Such an approach includes augmenting available data about the political participation of racial minorities, refining empirical measures to reflect racial politics in a complex, multiracial electorate, and revisiting available remedies in light of a problem with both political and legal dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重塑民主包容:亚裔美国人与投票权法案
美国目前保护投票权的法律框架因最高法院重新解释防止少数族裔投票权被稀释的规定而严重不稳定,需要重新思考以应对现代挑战。与此同时,这个国家本身在其政体的种族构成以及种族作为政治生活中的一个因素的复杂性和突出性方面也发生了巨大变化。在本文中,我们将重点关注现代种族多样性这一复杂现实中一个相对未被研究的组成部分,它说明了所有少数群体在持续的VRA挑战中面临的一些核心特征:亚裔美国人。在明显的政治权力被剥夺的情况下,令人好奇的是,亚裔美国人很少能成功地援引《投票权法案》(Voting Rights Act)第2条,这是一项专门为增强少数族裔政治权力而设计的法律措施。这是因为成功进行政治挑战的必要条件尚未出现吗?这个问题是结构性的吗?它是否暗示了制度设计中的问题?或者两者兼而有之,表明一个永久的政治少数派没有能力根据《投票法》获得法律救济的双重危害?社会科学和法律学者认为,用于触发VRA特殊保护的法律标准包含了对政治行为的不明确假设和对种族身份的过于简化的理解。本文试图动员对少数民族政治行为的见解,以多维度的方式思考民主排斥的法律补救措施。我们的核心论点是,民主排斥问题是多因素的,需要采取多管齐下的办法加以纠正。这种方法包括增加有关少数种族政治参与的现有数据,改进经验措施以反映复杂的多种族选民中的种族政治,并根据政治和法律层面的问题重新审视现有的补救办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Identification to Identity Theft: Public Perceptions of Biometric Privacy Harms Star Athletica and the Problem of Panaestheticism FARC Justice: Rebel Rule of Law Collateral Damage: A Public Housing Consequence of the "War on Drugs" A New Approach to Voir Dire on Racial Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1