Unfreezing the Question of History (1998–2008)

Jennifer M. Dixon
{"title":"Unfreezing the Question of History (1998–2008)","authors":"Jennifer M. Dixon","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501730245.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes Japan’s narrative of the Nanjing Massacre between 1990 and 2008. Over this period, the official narrative came to include admissions of responsibility and apologies, and then backtracked to resume mythmaking and relativizing (while continuing to apologize.) Pressures from China and Korea, along with transnational activism, contributed to the shift to apologizing and deepening acknowledgment. At the same time, domestic political considerations in Japan – most notably, domestic contestation, party politics and electoral concerns, and concerns about compensation claims – frequently shaped the content and extent of changes in the state’s narrative. In particular, deepening revisionism in Japan, including high-profile “gaffes” related to “history issues” and official visits to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine, both fed and served as markers of the backtracking.","PeriodicalId":292609,"journal":{"name":"Dark Pasts","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dark Pasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501730245.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyzes Japan’s narrative of the Nanjing Massacre between 1990 and 2008. Over this period, the official narrative came to include admissions of responsibility and apologies, and then backtracked to resume mythmaking and relativizing (while continuing to apologize.) Pressures from China and Korea, along with transnational activism, contributed to the shift to apologizing and deepening acknowledgment. At the same time, domestic political considerations in Japan – most notably, domestic contestation, party politics and electoral concerns, and concerns about compensation claims – frequently shaped the content and extent of changes in the state’s narrative. In particular, deepening revisionism in Japan, including high-profile “gaffes” related to “history issues” and official visits to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine, both fed and served as markers of the backtracking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解冻历史问题(1998-2008)
本章分析了1990年至2008年间日本对南京大屠杀的叙述。在这段时间里,官方的叙述开始包括承认责任和道歉,然后回过头来重新制造神话和相对化(同时继续道歉)。来自中国和韩国的压力,以及跨国行动主义,促成了向道歉和加深承认的转变。与此同时,日本国内的政治考虑——最明显的是国内争论、政党政治和选举关切,以及对赔偿要求的关切——经常影响着国家叙事变化的内容和程度。特别是,日本不断深化的修正主义,包括与“历史问题”有关的高调“失言”,以及对有争议的靖国神社的正式参拜,都助长并成为了这种倒退的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
1. Changing the State’s Story 3. From Silencing to Mythmaking (1950–early 1990s) Frontmatter Acronyms 2. The Armenian Genocide and Its Aftermath
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1