Human safety considerations from the use of anabolic agents in foodproducing animals.

A C Kolbye, M K Perez
{"title":"Human safety considerations from the use of anabolic agents in foodproducing animals.","authors":"A C Kolbye,&nbsp;M K Perez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The various anabolic agents used in food-producing animals may differ in terms of toxicological considerations related to evaluating human safety. Aside from initial toxicological testing, after chemical characterization of the compound to be administered and its related metabolites expected to occur as residues in food, most synthetic anabolic agents are subjected to chronic/carcinogenicity testing because of usage pattern likely to lead to the occurrence of residues in derived edible products. Initial testing requirements include acute and subchronic studies in appropriate rodent species including a reproduction test with the first generation offspring tested for 90 days post-weaning. This subchronic study serves to indicate potential problems with reproductive performance, foetal toxicity, birth deformities, and other chronic or preneoplastic conditions. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may grant approval for certain usages of specific compounds using a 2.000-fold safety margin in relation to a \"no deleterious effect\" level from the subchronic studies, with upper residue limits of 0.1 ppm in tissue and 0.01 ppm in milk or eggs if there are no indications that further testing should be required. If higher residue limits are requested, the petitioner must perform lifetime testing in two rodent species including in utero exposure and a minimum of three dose levels. Other rodent offspring should be carried for a total of three generations. A six to twelve month study in a non-rodent population is required. Teratology studies might be rquired in at least two species. If no carcinogenic potential is observed, a 100-fold safety margin in relation to the no effect level is generally accepted as the safe exposure level for residues. Should a statistically significant increase in tumors be observed in the test animals as compared to controls, the compound will be classified as a carcinogen or a suspect carcinogen depending on histopathological observations...</p>","PeriodicalId":75828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental quality and safety. Supplement","volume":" 5","pages":"212-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental quality and safety. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The various anabolic agents used in food-producing animals may differ in terms of toxicological considerations related to evaluating human safety. Aside from initial toxicological testing, after chemical characterization of the compound to be administered and its related metabolites expected to occur as residues in food, most synthetic anabolic agents are subjected to chronic/carcinogenicity testing because of usage pattern likely to lead to the occurrence of residues in derived edible products. Initial testing requirements include acute and subchronic studies in appropriate rodent species including a reproduction test with the first generation offspring tested for 90 days post-weaning. This subchronic study serves to indicate potential problems with reproductive performance, foetal toxicity, birth deformities, and other chronic or preneoplastic conditions. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may grant approval for certain usages of specific compounds using a 2.000-fold safety margin in relation to a "no deleterious effect" level from the subchronic studies, with upper residue limits of 0.1 ppm in tissue and 0.01 ppm in milk or eggs if there are no indications that further testing should be required. If higher residue limits are requested, the petitioner must perform lifetime testing in two rodent species including in utero exposure and a minimum of three dose levels. Other rodent offspring should be carried for a total of three generations. A six to twelve month study in a non-rodent population is required. Teratology studies might be rquired in at least two species. If no carcinogenic potential is observed, a 100-fold safety margin in relation to the no effect level is generally accepted as the safe exposure level for residues. Should a statistically significant increase in tumors be observed in the test animals as compared to controls, the compound will be classified as a carcinogen or a suspect carcinogen depending on histopathological observations...

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从食用动物中使用合成代谢剂对人类安全的考虑。
用于食用动物的各种合成代谢剂在评估人体安全性的毒理学考虑方面可能有所不同。除了最初的毒理学测试外,在对拟使用的化合物及其相关代谢物进行化学表征后,预计会在食物中出现残留物,大多数合成合成代谢剂都要进行慢性/致癌性测试,因为使用模式可能导致衍生食用产品中出现残留物。初始试验要求包括在适当啮齿类动物中进行急性和亚慢性试验,包括对断奶后90天的第一代后代进行繁殖试验。这项亚慢性研究用于提示生殖能力、胎儿毒性、出生畸形和其他慢性或肿瘤前疾病的潜在问题。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)可能会批准特定化合物的某些用途,使用与亚慢性研究中“无有害影响”水平相关的2000倍安全边际,如果没有迹象表明需要进一步测试,则组织中的最高残留限量为0.1 ppm,牛奶或鸡蛋中的最高残留限量为0.01 ppm。如果要求更高的残留限量,申请人必须在两种啮齿类动物中进行寿命测试,包括在子宫内暴露和至少三个剂量水平。其他啮齿类动物的后代应总共携带三代。需要在非啮齿动物种群中进行6至12个月的研究。可能需要对至少两个物种进行致畸学研究。如果没有观察到致癌潜力,一般认为与无影响水平相关的100倍安全边际是残留物的安全接触水平。如果与对照相比,在试验动物中观察到肿瘤的统计学显著增加,则根据组织病理学观察,该化合物将被归类为致癌物或可疑致癌物……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plasma levels and secretion rate of steroids with anabolic activity in man. An approach to the anabolic action of androgens by an experimental system. Epidemiological studies related to the use of hormonal agents in animal production. Pharmacological and endocrinological studies on anabolic agents. Role of growth hormone in improving animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1