Computer Forensics in Forensis

S. Peisert, M. Bishop, K. Marzullo
{"title":"Computer Forensics in Forensis","authors":"S. Peisert, M. Bishop, K. Marzullo","doi":"10.1145/1368506.1368521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different users apply computer forensic systems, models, and terminology in very different ways. They often make incompatible assumptions and reach different conclusions about the validity and accuracy of the methods they use to log, audit, and present forensic data. This is problematic, because these fields are related, and results from one can be meaningful to the others. We present several forensic systems and discuss situations in which they produce valid and accurate conclusions and also situations in which their accuracy is suspect. We also present forensic models and discuss areas in which they are useful and areas in which they could be augmented. Finally, we present some recommendations about how computer scientists, forensic practitioners, lawyers, and judges could build more complete models of forensics that take into account appropriate legal details and lead to scientifically valid forensic analysis.","PeriodicalId":391486,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1368506.1368521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

Different users apply computer forensic systems, models, and terminology in very different ways. They often make incompatible assumptions and reach different conclusions about the validity and accuracy of the methods they use to log, audit, and present forensic data. This is problematic, because these fields are related, and results from one can be meaningful to the others. We present several forensic systems and discuss situations in which they produce valid and accurate conclusions and also situations in which their accuracy is suspect. We also present forensic models and discuss areas in which they are useful and areas in which they could be augmented. Finally, we present some recommendations about how computer scientists, forensic practitioners, lawyers, and judges could build more complete models of forensics that take into account appropriate legal details and lead to scientifically valid forensic analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
取证中的计算机取证
不同的用户以非常不同的方式应用计算机取证系统、模型和术语。他们经常对用于记录、审计和呈现取证数据的方法的有效性和准确性做出不相容的假设,并得出不同的结论。这是有问题的,因为这些领域是相关的,一个领域的结果可能对其他领域有意义。我们提出了几种法医系统,并讨论了它们产生有效和准确结论的情况,以及它们的准确性值得怀疑的情况。我们还介绍了法医模型,并讨论了它们有用的领域和可以增强的领域。最后,我们就计算机科学家、法医从业者、律师和法官如何建立更完整的法医模型提出了一些建议,这些模型考虑到适当的法律细节,并导致科学有效的法医分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Research Configuration for a Digital Network Forensic Lab SÁDI - Statistical Analysis for Data Type Identification Cognitive-Maps Based Investigation of Digital Security Incidents Implications of Attorney Experiences with Digital Forensics and Electronic Evidence in the United States Exemplifying Attack Identification and Analysis in a Novel Forensically Viable Syslog Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1