Why We Need a Lifetime Retirement Saving Limit

James Pierlot
{"title":"Why We Need a Lifetime Retirement Saving Limit","authors":"James Pierlot","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1965829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 1977 to 2007, DB pension plan membership dropped from 31% of private sector workers to 16%. Today, more than 12 million of Canada’s 17.5 million workers do not participate in a DB plan. With declining DB pension coverage, low interest rates and increasing life expectancy, pensions are harder to accumulate — and more expensive. Even workers who delay retirement will need to save more to maintain their living standards in retirement. But can they? For many workers saving in RRSPs and DC pension plans, the answer is no, because contribution limits are too low. To demonstrate this, we developed a model that shows the retirement savings accumulations possible under Canada’s tax rules for retirement saving from 1974 through 2011.","PeriodicalId":370614,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Canadian Law - Public Law (Topic)","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Canadian Law - Public Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1965829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 1977 to 2007, DB pension plan membership dropped from 31% of private sector workers to 16%. Today, more than 12 million of Canada’s 17.5 million workers do not participate in a DB plan. With declining DB pension coverage, low interest rates and increasing life expectancy, pensions are harder to accumulate — and more expensive. Even workers who delay retirement will need to save more to maintain their living standards in retirement. But can they? For many workers saving in RRSPs and DC pension plans, the answer is no, because contribution limits are too low. To demonstrate this, we developed a model that shows the retirement savings accumulations possible under Canada’s tax rules for retirement saving from 1974 through 2011.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么我们需要终身退休储蓄限额
从1977年到2007年,私营部门员工的退休金计划成员比例从31%下降到16%。如今,加拿大1750万工人中有1200多万人没有参加固定退休金计划。随着固定退休金覆盖面的下降、低利率和预期寿命的延长,养老金更难积累——也更昂贵。即使推迟退休的工人也需要存更多的钱来维持退休后的生活水平。但他们能做到吗?对于许多在rrsp和DC养老金计划中存钱的工人来说,答案是否定的,因为缴款限额太低了。为了证明这一点,我们开发了一个模型,该模型显示了1974年至2011年加拿大退休储蓄税收规则下可能的退休储蓄积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Canadian Model for Dealing With Asylum Seekers and Refugees Policy Forum: Taxing Wealth Transfers in Canada Using an Accession Tax Considerations for Basic Income as a COVID-19 Response Subsidies and Value-Added Tax: A Comparative Study of Law and Practice in Canada and the European Union Rationalizing the Canadian Income Tax System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1