{"title":"Fratila and another v SSWP [2021] UKSC 53","authors":"Georgina Fenton","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. In Fratila, the claimants – two Romanian nationals living in the UK with pre-settled status (PSS) granted under the EU Settlement Scheme – had their applications for Universal Credit (UC) refused on the basis that they did not have a qualifying right to reside. This is because the amendment the 2019 Regulations made to the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (‘the 2013 Regulations’) – specifically the addition of reg 9 (3)(d)(i) – prevents leave to remain in the UK arising from PSS from constituting a qualifying right of residence for the purposes of UC applications.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
2. In Fratila, the claimants – two Romanian nationals living in the UK with pre-settled status (PSS) granted under the EU Settlement Scheme – had their applications for Universal Credit (UC) refused on the basis that they did not have a qualifying right to reside. This is because the amendment the 2019 Regulations made to the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (‘the 2013 Regulations’) – specifically the addition of reg 9 (3)(d)(i) – prevents leave to remain in the UK arising from PSS from constituting a qualifying right of residence for the purposes of UC applications.