Common Governance and Socialist Cooperative Institutions in Romanian Agriculture

Silviu-George Colonescu
{"title":"Common Governance and Socialist Cooperative Institutions in Romanian Agriculture","authors":"Silviu-George Colonescu","doi":"10.25019/perspol/21.14.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this paper aims the distribution of finite resources under the imperatives of collectivist institutions and a governance based on the precepts of socializing the means of society. In the first instance theoretical formulas will be used that propose methodologies for governing the common goods from the ostromian perspective (Ostrom, 2007) and alternatives for overcoming the dilemmas of collective action starting from basic concepts (Hardin, 1968), respectively forms of government that can overcomes the excesses of users of common goods that inexorably lead to the spoiling and depletion of existing resources. Complementary to this preliminary discussion necessary for further operationalization I will use the theoretical model that explains, as an extension, the typology and functionality of natural resources and according to this link between combined theoretical models I will determine what type of asset each institutional form proposed for governing assets mentioned above. The final section will be dedicated to determining which type of institutional alternative, for the governance of common resources, is joined by the socialist ideological approach when talking about the collectivization of agriculture and the institutional form that agricultural associations must take, respectively in which typology could allocate the goods, following the de facto analysis of the agricultural collectivist type organization for the socialist period, in the same way of working – identifying institutional arrangements, typology of goods, in order to identify possible inconsistencies between the normative, declarative ideological model and its implementation in real social space. The study starts from the socialist ideological assumptions regarding the governance of agricultural households and tries to test whether the factual representation of agricultural cooperatives in Romania and implicitly in the general ideological project overlaps and fulfills the theoretical aspirations regarding the collectivization of agriculture. For these it will be considered to formulate research questions and consult the extensive bibliography in the field of agricultural groups proposed by the socialist frame of reference.","PeriodicalId":164723,"journal":{"name":"Perspective Politice","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspective Politice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25019/perspol/21.14.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this paper aims the distribution of finite resources under the imperatives of collectivist institutions and a governance based on the precepts of socializing the means of society. In the first instance theoretical formulas will be used that propose methodologies for governing the common goods from the ostromian perspective (Ostrom, 2007) and alternatives for overcoming the dilemmas of collective action starting from basic concepts (Hardin, 1968), respectively forms of government that can overcomes the excesses of users of common goods that inexorably lead to the spoiling and depletion of existing resources. Complementary to this preliminary discussion necessary for further operationalization I will use the theoretical model that explains, as an extension, the typology and functionality of natural resources and according to this link between combined theoretical models I will determine what type of asset each institutional form proposed for governing assets mentioned above. The final section will be dedicated to determining which type of institutional alternative, for the governance of common resources, is joined by the socialist ideological approach when talking about the collectivization of agriculture and the institutional form that agricultural associations must take, respectively in which typology could allocate the goods, following the de facto analysis of the agricultural collectivist type organization for the socialist period, in the same way of working – identifying institutional arrangements, typology of goods, in order to identify possible inconsistencies between the normative, declarative ideological model and its implementation in real social space. The study starts from the socialist ideological assumptions regarding the governance of agricultural households and tries to test whether the factual representation of agricultural cooperatives in Romania and implicitly in the general ideological project overlaps and fulfills the theoretical aspirations regarding the collectivization of agriculture. For these it will be considered to formulate research questions and consult the extensive bibliography in the field of agricultural groups proposed by the socialist frame of reference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚农业的共同治理和社会主义合作机构
本文的主要目标是在集体主义制度的要求下,在社会手段社会化的原则基础上进行有限资源的分配。首先,将使用理论公式,从ostromian的角度提出管理共同利益的方法(Ostrom, 2007),以及克服从基本概念开始的集体行动困境的替代方案(Hardin, 1968),分别是可以克服共同利益用户过度使用的政府形式,这些过度使用不可避免地导致现有资源的破坏和枯竭。作为进一步运作所必需的初步讨论的补充,我将使用理论模型,作为扩展,解释自然资源的类型和功能,并根据组合理论模型之间的这种联系,我将确定每种制度形式为管理上述资产所提议的资产类型。最后一部分将致力于在讨论农业集体化和农业协会必须采取的制度形式时,确定哪种类型的制度选择,用于共同资源的治理,与社会主义意识形态方法相结合,分别是类型学可以分配商品,接下来是对社会主义时期农业集体主义类型组织的实际分析。以同样的工作方式——识别制度安排、商品类型学,以识别规范性、说明性意识形态模式与其在现实社会空间中的实施之间可能存在的不一致。本研究从社会主义关于农户治理的意识形态假设出发,并试图检验罗马尼亚农业合作社的事实代表性和一般意识形态项目中的隐含性是否重叠并实现了关于农业集体化的理论愿望。为此,将考虑制定研究问题,并参考社会主义参照系提出的农业群体领域的广泛参考书目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Europe’s Export of Cybersurveillance Technology: Impacts on Myanmar’s Civil Society The Intellectual History of Romanian Feminism from Early Transition to Democratic Deconsolidation and Illiberalism Technological Progress and the Transformation of Society: Perspectives for Individual Development Reflections on Global Governance and Political Participation Municipal Size and Efficiency in Romania. Larger is Better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1