Meeting the Need for a Technologically Driven Justice Delivery System: The Elixir of Rights and Judicial Expediency

Foluke O. Dada, E. Alemika
{"title":"Meeting the Need for a Technologically Driven Justice Delivery System: The Elixir of Rights and Judicial Expediency","authors":"Foluke O. Dada, E. Alemika","doi":"10.4236/blr.2020.113049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of justice is found in its efficacy while the promptness of justice determines its effect. Hence, the aphorism, “justice delayed is justice denied”. It is well known fact that the justice system in Nigeria, like many developing countries, is like igniting a snail on a hundred-kilometer journey. The problem of delay in justice is compounded in an unforeseen period like the world’s current state of the Coronavirus pandemic. By virtue of the national lock-down, the justice system has been on a halt and as such, every aspect of life which is tied to a virile judicial system is also affected. The aim of this paper therefore, is an attempt to analyse how technology can be employed for an effective justice delivery system while the pandemic situation persists. This exercise begins with an examination of the legal provisions available in Nigerian law to meet the demands for a technological-driven effective justice system. This is done by analysing the various provisions of the Evidence Act, High Courts Civil Procedure Rules, Administration of Criminal Justice Laws of States, Courts’ Practice Directions and other relevant provisions. Hence, the thrust of this paper is to elicit palpable elixirs aimed to achieve the decongestion of courts and improve access both during emergencies such as the COVID-19 situation and in the normal course of justice delivery thereafter.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.113049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of justice is found in its efficacy while the promptness of justice determines its effect. Hence, the aphorism, “justice delayed is justice denied”. It is well known fact that the justice system in Nigeria, like many developing countries, is like igniting a snail on a hundred-kilometer journey. The problem of delay in justice is compounded in an unforeseen period like the world’s current state of the Coronavirus pandemic. By virtue of the national lock-down, the justice system has been on a halt and as such, every aspect of life which is tied to a virile judicial system is also affected. The aim of this paper therefore, is an attempt to analyse how technology can be employed for an effective justice delivery system while the pandemic situation persists. This exercise begins with an examination of the legal provisions available in Nigerian law to meet the demands for a technological-driven effective justice system. This is done by analysing the various provisions of the Evidence Act, High Courts Civil Procedure Rules, Administration of Criminal Justice Laws of States, Courts’ Practice Directions and other relevant provisions. Hence, the thrust of this paper is to elicit palpable elixirs aimed to achieve the decongestion of courts and improve access both during emergencies such as the COVID-19 situation and in the normal course of justice delivery thereafter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
满足技术驱动的司法交付系统的需求:权利和司法权宜之计的灵丹妙药
司法的质量体现在司法的效力上,而司法的及时性决定司法的效果。因此,有句格言说,“延迟的正义就是否定的正义”。众所周知,尼日利亚的司法系统和许多发展中国家一样,就像在百公里的旅程中点燃一只蜗牛。在世界目前处于冠状病毒大流行状态这样一个不可预见的时期,司法延误问题变得更加复杂。由于全国封锁,司法系统已处于停顿状态,因此,与男子气概的司法系统有关的生活的每一个方面也受到影响。因此,本文的目的是试图分析在疫情持续的情况下,如何利用技术建立有效的司法体系。这项工作首先审查尼日利亚法律中现有的法律规定,以满足对技术驱动的有效司法系统的要求。这是通过分析《证据法》、《高等法院民事诉讼规则》、《各州刑事司法法律管理》、《法院实务指示》和其他有关规定的各项规定来完成的。因此,本文的主旨是提出切实可行的灵丹妙药,旨在缓解法院的拥堵,并在COVID-19疫情等紧急情况下以及此后的正常司法过程中改善获取途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Law in Wildlife Management The Incredible Shrinking Fourth Amendment —The Ongoing Erosion of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America The Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research: Ethics Guardians or Keystone Cops? Research on the Development Direction of International Commercial Arbitration Network Institutionalizing Social Norms and Legal Culture: Social Dynamics under Legal Awareness Policy in Contemporary China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1