Fault Classification of the Error Detection Logic in the Blade Resilient Template

F. Kuentzer, Alexandre M. Amory
{"title":"Fault Classification of the Error Detection Logic in the Blade Resilient Template","authors":"F. Kuentzer, Alexandre M. Amory","doi":"10.1109/ASYNC.2016.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resilient architectures emerged as a promising solution to remove worst-case timing margins added due to process, voltage and temperature variation, improving system performance while reducing energy consumption. Asynchronous circuits can also improve energy efficiency and performance due to the absence of a global clock. A recently proposed circuit template, called Blade, leverages the advantages of both asynchronous and resilient techniques. However, Blade still presents challenges in terms of testing, which hinder its practical application. This paper evaluates the fault behavior of the Error Detection Logic (EDL) block of Blade with single stuck-at or propagation delay fault models. We propose a fault classification based on the effects observed in the overall circuit operation while in the presence of a fault. This classification shows the obtained fault coverage assuming three different testability scenarios and it also shows that a single fault can entirely disable an EDL, disabling its resilience. The proposed classification can be used in the future to improve the design for testability of resilient architectures.","PeriodicalId":314538,"journal":{"name":"2016 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (ASYNC)","volume":"692 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (ASYNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASYNC.2016.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Resilient architectures emerged as a promising solution to remove worst-case timing margins added due to process, voltage and temperature variation, improving system performance while reducing energy consumption. Asynchronous circuits can also improve energy efficiency and performance due to the absence of a global clock. A recently proposed circuit template, called Blade, leverages the advantages of both asynchronous and resilient techniques. However, Blade still presents challenges in terms of testing, which hinder its practical application. This paper evaluates the fault behavior of the Error Detection Logic (EDL) block of Blade with single stuck-at or propagation delay fault models. We propose a fault classification based on the effects observed in the overall circuit operation while in the presence of a fault. This classification shows the obtained fault coverage assuming three different testability scenarios and it also shows that a single fault can entirely disable an EDL, disabling its resilience. The proposed classification can be used in the future to improve the design for testability of resilient architectures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刀片弹性模板中检错逻辑的故障分类
弹性架构作为一种有希望的解决方案出现,可以消除由于工艺、电压和温度变化而增加的最坏情况时间裕度,提高系统性能,同时降低能耗。由于没有全局时钟,异步电路还可以提高能源效率和性能。最近提出的电路模板,称为刀片,利用异步和弹性技术的优点。然而,Blade在测试方面仍然存在挑战,这阻碍了它的实际应用。本文采用单卡滞故障模型和单传播延迟故障模型对叶片错误检测逻辑模块的故障行为进行了评估。我们提出了一种基于故障存在时在整个电路运行中观察到的影响的故障分类。该分类显示了假设三种不同的可测试性场景所获得的故障覆盖率,还显示了单个故障可以完全禁用EDL,从而禁用其弹性。所提出的分类方法可用于改进弹性架构的可测试性设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Clock: A Promising Approach toward GALSification Low Power QDI Asynchronous FFT Efficient Metastability-Containing Gray Code 2-Sort Adding Conditionality to Resilient Bundled-Data Designs Asynchronously Controlled Frequency Locked Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1