Fault tolerant control to mechanical sensor failures for Induction Motor drive: A comparative study of voting algorithms

M. Boukhnifer, A. Raisemche, D. Diallo, C. Larouci
{"title":"Fault tolerant control to mechanical sensor failures for Induction Motor drive: A comparative study of voting algorithms","authors":"M. Boukhnifer, A. Raisemche, D. Diallo, C. Larouci","doi":"10.1109/IECON.2013.6699583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comparative study of four voting algorithms for two Induction Motor drive fault tolerant control to speed sensor failure schemes. In both Output and Input Fault Tolerant controller, the voting algorithm chooses the most appropriate output signal to ensure the best behavior in degraded mode. The performances are evaluated through simulations of a 7.5 kW Induction Motor drive with robustness testing against parametric variations, as well as under load testing. The results show that Euler, Newton-Raphson and Maximum Likelihood voting algorithms are more efficient than the Weighted Average in both Fault Tolerant Control schemes.","PeriodicalId":237327,"journal":{"name":"IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2013.6699583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this paper, we present a comparative study of four voting algorithms for two Induction Motor drive fault tolerant control to speed sensor failure schemes. In both Output and Input Fault Tolerant controller, the voting algorithm chooses the most appropriate output signal to ensure the best behavior in degraded mode. The performances are evaluated through simulations of a 7.5 kW Induction Motor drive with robustness testing against parametric variations, as well as under load testing. The results show that Euler, Newton-Raphson and Maximum Likelihood voting algorithms are more efficient than the Weighted Average in both Fault Tolerant Control schemes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感应电机驱动机械传感器故障的容错控制:投票算法的比较研究
在本文中,我们提出了四种投票算法的两种感应电机驱动容错控制的速度传感器故障方案的比较研究。在输出容错控制器和输入容错控制器中,投票算法选择最合适的输出信号,以确保在退化模式下的最佳行为。通过对7.5 kW感应电机驱动器的仿真,以及对参数变化和负载测试的鲁棒性测试,对性能进行了评估。结果表明,在两种容错控制方案中,Euler、Newton-Raphson和极大似然投票算法都比加权平均算法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving 3D scan matching time of the coarse binary cubes method with fast spatial subsampling Fault-tolerant operation of an open-end winding five-phase PMSM drive with inverter faults Large scale micro-macro bilateral control using piezoelectric cantilever with plant nominalization A study on methods to design and select energy storage devices for Fuel Cell hybrid powered railway vehicles Development of a half-circle-shaped tubular permanent magnet machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1