KEABSAHAN HASIL CETAK (SCREENSHOT) SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIKi DALAMiPEMERIKSAAN PERKARA PERDATA

Tyah Safira
{"title":"KEABSAHAN HASIL CETAK (SCREENSHOT) SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIKi DALAMiPEMERIKSAAN PERKARA PERDATA","authors":"Tyah Safira","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i3.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of computer technology, telecommunications, and information has gone so far that today is very different from 10 years ago with trade and industrial business has given rise to transaction models because of the advances and advantages of technology. In today's digital age computers, telecommunications, and information have proliferated enormously, making the utilization of the technology drive screenshot proving to be one of the tools of evidence used in the trial. The study aims to know the legali arrangement ofi the evidentiali printing (screenshots) i in thei civil casei hearing, andi to learni the strengthi of thei printingi evidencei (screenshot) i in thei civil suiti proving. The researchi method usedi was a normative-lawi study withi a constitutionali approach associatedi with it. Researchi shows thati the legali setting ofi screenshot evidencei can be usedi in civili suit trials. Then, i the strengthi of thei screenshot toolsi had ai bindingi proof forcei for bothi the judgei and the parties. Thus, i it may bei concluded thati a screenshot evidencei device couldi be usedi in a civili hearing becausei it was ini the samei positioni as thei other evidencei and couldi be usedi legally, i and thisi screenshot evidencei was binding oni both judgei and othersi who wouldi use it","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of computer technology, telecommunications, and information has gone so far that today is very different from 10 years ago with trade and industrial business has given rise to transaction models because of the advances and advantages of technology. In today's digital age computers, telecommunications, and information have proliferated enormously, making the utilization of the technology drive screenshot proving to be one of the tools of evidence used in the trial. The study aims to know the legali arrangement ofi the evidentiali printing (screenshots) i in thei civil casei hearing, andi to learni the strengthi of thei printingi evidencei (screenshot) i in thei civil suiti proving. The researchi method usedi was a normative-lawi study withi a constitutionali approach associatedi with it. Researchi shows thati the legali setting ofi screenshot evidencei can be usedi in civili suit trials. Then, i the strengthi of thei screenshot toolsi had ai bindingi proof forcei for bothi the judgei and the parties. Thus, i it may bei concluded thati a screenshot evidencei device couldi be usedi in a civili hearing becausei it was ini the samei positioni as thei other evidencei and couldi be usedi legally, i and thisi screenshot evidencei was binding oni both judgei and othersi who wouldi use it
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机技术、电信和信息的发展已经走得很远,今天与10年前的贸易和工业商业有很大的不同,因为技术的进步和优势,产生了交易模式。在当今的数字时代,计算机、电信和信息的飞速发展,使得技术驱动截屏证明成为审判中使用的证据工具之一。本研究旨在了解他们在民事案件审理中打印证据(截图)的法律安排,并了解他们在民事诉讼举证中打印证据(截图)的力度。所采用的研究方法是一种规范性法律研究,并与之相关联的宪法研究方法。研究表明,在法律设定下,截图证据可以用于民事诉讼审判。然后,在他们的截图工具的力量下,他们对法官和当事人都有约束力的证明力。因此,如果可以得出结论,如果截图证据装置可以在民事听证中使用,因为它与其他证据处于相同的地位,可以合法使用,那么它和这个截图证据对法官和其他不会使用它的人都具有约束力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MELARIKAN WANITA YANG BELUM CUKUP UMUR PUTUSAN /36/Pid.B/2019 PN GST TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP ANALISIS HUKUM KEBIJAKAN KELEBIHAN DIMENSI DAN KELEBIHAN MUATAN TERHADAP DEMONSTRAN GERAKAN SOPIR JAWA TIMUR ANALISIS HUKUM KONTEN NEGATIF DI PLATFORM YOUTUBE DI INDONESIA KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA E-LITIGASI BERLANDASKAN NILAI KEADILAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1