Precision ECT for major depressive disorder: A review of clinical factors, laboratory, and physiologic biomarkers as predictors of response and remission

Zhixing Yao , William V. McCall , Norah Essali , Ethan Wohl , Carmen Parker , Peter B. Rosenquist , Nagy A. Youssef
{"title":"Precision ECT for major depressive disorder: A review of clinical factors, laboratory, and physiologic biomarkers as predictors of response and remission","authors":"Zhixing Yao ,&nbsp;William V. McCall ,&nbsp;Norah Essali ,&nbsp;Ethan Wohl ,&nbsp;Carmen Parker ,&nbsp;Peter B. Rosenquist ,&nbsp;Nagy A. Youssef","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2019.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Predicting which patient(s) will respond to Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) has very important clinical implications. The aim of this manuscript is to review the current literature on clinical, physiologic and laboratory biomarkers as predictors of ECT response and remission related to the </span>treatment of </span>major depressive disorder<span><span> (MDD). We will briefly discuss available research on the predictors of cognitive side effects of ECT. Although each clinical factor may have subtle influence on ECT response, taken together clinical predictors can lead to a robust treatment plan tailored for an individual patient, and advise on the likelihood of ECT response. Available literature supports the predictive value of several clinical factors. Older age, psychotic depression, and depression severity positively predict ECT response. Limited data is available for </span>catatonia specific to MDD, but overall data shows positive response of ECT for the treatment of catatonia. Multiple medication trials in the current episode and comorbid </span></span>psychiatric diagnosis (including borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder) predict lower response.</p><p><span>Lack of widespread clinical availability and validation in larger studies limits current clinical utility of laboratory and physiologic biomarkers. Genetic<span><span>, epigenetic, and </span>proteomic factors have been investigated predominately in </span></span>animal models, but ongoing research in human studies including neuroimaging is promising. Thus, these biomarkers provide an exciting outlook that may elevate the precision of ECT response and remission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"17 ","pages":"Pages 23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pmip.2019.07.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246817171930002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Predicting which patient(s) will respond to Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) has very important clinical implications. The aim of this manuscript is to review the current literature on clinical, physiologic and laboratory biomarkers as predictors of ECT response and remission related to the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). We will briefly discuss available research on the predictors of cognitive side effects of ECT. Although each clinical factor may have subtle influence on ECT response, taken together clinical predictors can lead to a robust treatment plan tailored for an individual patient, and advise on the likelihood of ECT response. Available literature supports the predictive value of several clinical factors. Older age, psychotic depression, and depression severity positively predict ECT response. Limited data is available for catatonia specific to MDD, but overall data shows positive response of ECT for the treatment of catatonia. Multiple medication trials in the current episode and comorbid psychiatric diagnosis (including borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder) predict lower response.

Lack of widespread clinical availability and validation in larger studies limits current clinical utility of laboratory and physiologic biomarkers. Genetic, epigenetic, and proteomic factors have been investigated predominately in animal models, but ongoing research in human studies including neuroimaging is promising. Thus, these biomarkers provide an exciting outlook that may elevate the precision of ECT response and remission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精确ECT治疗重度抑郁症:临床因素、实验室和生理生物标志物作为反应和缓解预测因子的综述
预测哪些病人会对电休克疗法(ECT)有反应具有非常重要的临床意义。这篇论文的目的是回顾目前关于临床、生理和实验室生物标志物作为预测ECT反应和缓解与重度抑郁症(MDD)治疗相关的文献。我们将简要讨论电痉挛疗法认知副作用预测因素的现有研究。虽然每个临床因素可能对电痉挛反应有微妙的影响,但综合考虑临床预测因素可以为个体患者量身定制一个强有力的治疗计划,并就电痉挛反应的可能性提出建议。现有文献支持几个临床因素的预测价值。年龄、精神病性抑郁和抑郁严重程度正预测ECT反应。关于MDD特有的紧张症的数据有限,但总体数据显示ECT治疗紧张症的积极反应。在当前发作和共病精神病学诊断(包括边缘性人格障碍和物质使用障碍)的多重药物试验预测较低的反应。缺乏广泛的临床可用性和大规模研究的验证限制了目前实验室和生理生物标志物的临床应用。遗传、表观遗传和蛋白质组学因素主要在动物模型中进行了研究,但正在进行的包括神经影像学在内的人类研究也很有希望。因此,这些生物标志物提供了一个令人兴奋的前景,可能会提高ECT反应和缓解的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1