User Tracking Accuracy during Smooth Pursuit of a Target with and without a Crosshair

Assaf Botzer, Tomer Elbaum, Michael Wagner
{"title":"User Tracking Accuracy during Smooth Pursuit of a Target with and without a Crosshair","authors":"Assaf Botzer, Tomer Elbaum, Michael Wagner","doi":"10.1145/3335082.3335110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gaze interface is a human-computer interaction method that offers numerous benefits to users. Therefore, researchers and practitioners are investigating key design issues in gaze interfaces. In this investigation, we compared user tracking accuracy during smooth pursuit of a target with and without a crosshair. Our comparison was based on data from an experiment in which participants tracked a moving target with a crosshair that they controlled with their eyes and on data from a similar experiment in which users tracked the same target without a crosshair. Maneuvering types and velocity of the target alternated between the experimental blocks. We found that mean tracking accuracy was lower when the target was moving faster and when participants used a crosshair. Our findings suggest that the usage of pointers (e.g., crosshairs, cursors) during smooth pursuit of targets might impair tracking accuracy. These findings resonate with previous concerns about the shifting of user attention from the target to the pointer.","PeriodicalId":279162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gaze interface is a human-computer interaction method that offers numerous benefits to users. Therefore, researchers and practitioners are investigating key design issues in gaze interfaces. In this investigation, we compared user tracking accuracy during smooth pursuit of a target with and without a crosshair. Our comparison was based on data from an experiment in which participants tracked a moving target with a crosshair that they controlled with their eyes and on data from a similar experiment in which users tracked the same target without a crosshair. Maneuvering types and velocity of the target alternated between the experimental blocks. We found that mean tracking accuracy was lower when the target was moving faster and when participants used a crosshair. Our findings suggest that the usage of pointers (e.g., crosshairs, cursors) during smooth pursuit of targets might impair tracking accuracy. These findings resonate with previous concerns about the shifting of user attention from the target to the pointer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有和没有准星的情况下,用户在平滑追踪目标时的跟踪精度
注视界面是一种人机交互方式,为用户提供了许多好处。因此,研究者和实践者正在研究注视界面的关键设计问题。在本研究中,我们比较了用户在使用和不使用十字准星平滑追踪目标时的跟踪精度。我们的比较是基于一个实验的数据,在这个实验中,参与者用他们用眼睛控制的十字准星跟踪一个移动的目标,而在另一个类似的实验中,用户不用十字准星跟踪同一个目标。目标的机动类型和速度在实验块之间交替。我们发现,当目标移动得更快时,当参与者使用准星时,平均跟踪精度会降低。我们的研究结果表明,使用指针(例如,十字准星,光标)在顺利追求目标可能会损害跟踪的准确性。这些发现与之前关于用户注意力从目标转移到指针的担忧产生了共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards an empirically developed scale for measuring trust Design Friction Category, Time, and Space: Structures in Cross-Media Design and Production Rethinking Cognitive Ergonomics Older adults eating together in a virtual living room: opportunities and limitations of eating in augmented virtuality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1