Environmental Law Has Failed. Can Transformative Ecological Change Begin in Appalachia?

N. Stump
{"title":"Environmental Law Has Failed. Can Transformative Ecological Change Begin in Appalachia?","authors":"N. Stump","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3898052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central Appalachia, a region encompassing parts of West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia, often is characterized as a “national sacrifice zone.” Fossil fuel industries have devastated the landscape here and in broader Appalachia for more than a century. They also have profoundly exploited the people along lines of class, race, and gender—all in pursuit of maximum profits. I was raised in Appalachia, and I live and work there now at the West Virginia University College of Law. In my new book, Remaking Appalachia: Ecosocialism, Ecofeminism, and Law, I have concluded that legal reform alone from within our unjust and ecologically unsustainable capitalist system will never guarantee Appalachia a healthy environment where people can live safely. Modern environmental law has failed Appalachia because it works through institutions that have been shaped for decades to ultimately support destructive industry over genuine public and ecological interests. Instead, I believe Appalachia needs radical social change to make genuine environmental progress—and that it has the ingredients. Many Appalachians are ready to change the course of our region’s future by demanding true system change rather than niche environmental reforms alone.","PeriodicalId":175326,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central Appalachia, a region encompassing parts of West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia, often is characterized as a “national sacrifice zone.” Fossil fuel industries have devastated the landscape here and in broader Appalachia for more than a century. They also have profoundly exploited the people along lines of class, race, and gender—all in pursuit of maximum profits. I was raised in Appalachia, and I live and work there now at the West Virginia University College of Law. In my new book, Remaking Appalachia: Ecosocialism, Ecofeminism, and Law, I have concluded that legal reform alone from within our unjust and ecologically unsustainable capitalist system will never guarantee Appalachia a healthy environment where people can live safely. Modern environmental law has failed Appalachia because it works through institutions that have been shaped for decades to ultimately support destructive industry over genuine public and ecological interests. Instead, I believe Appalachia needs radical social change to make genuine environmental progress—and that it has the ingredients. Many Appalachians are ready to change the course of our region’s future by demanding true system change rather than niche environmental reforms alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境法失败了。阿巴拉契亚地区能否开始转型生态变化?
阿巴拉契亚中部包括西弗吉尼亚州、肯塔基州、田纳西州和弗吉尼亚州的部分地区,常被称为“国家牺牲区”。一个多世纪以来,化石燃料工业破坏了这里和更广阔的阿巴拉契亚地区的景观。为了追求最大的利润,他们还对人民进行了阶级、种族和性别的深刻剥削。我在阿巴拉契亚长大,现在在西弗吉尼亚大学法学院生活和工作。在我的新书《重塑阿巴拉契亚:生态社会主义、生态女权主义和法律》中,我得出结论,在我们不公正和生态上不可持续的资本主义制度下,仅靠法律改革永远无法保证阿巴拉契亚有一个人们可以安全生活的健康环境。现代环境法之所以在阿巴拉契亚失败,是因为它通过几十年来形成的制度来运作,这些制度最终支持破坏性工业,而不是真正的公众和生态利益。相反,我认为阿巴拉契亚需要彻底的社会变革来实现真正的环境进步,而且它具备了这些要素。许多阿巴拉契亚人已经准备好改变我们地区的未来,他们要求真正的制度变革,而不仅仅是环境改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between sustainability, purpose, and resilience in the context of corporations: a conceptual framework Reforming the International Monetary Fund’s Debt Sustainability Assessments towards Achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Crucial Post-Pandemic Recovery Agenda La democracia ambiental y el Acuerdo de Escazú en Colombia a partir de la Constitución Ecológica de 1991 (Environmental Democracy and the Escazu Agreement in Colombia since the Ecological Constitution of 1991) Implementing Sustainable Development Goals in India: Progress So far The Effects of Neighboring Parties on the Value of Rights: Evidence from Timber Harvests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1