CoCOA: A Framework for Comparing Aggregate Client Operations in BPO Services

R. Ghosh, Avantika Gupta, S. Chattopadhyay, A. Banerjee, K. Dasgupta
{"title":"CoCOA: A Framework for Comparing Aggregate Client Operations in BPO Services","authors":"R. Ghosh, Avantika Gupta, S. Chattopadhyay, A. Banerjee, K. Dasgupta","doi":"10.1109/SCC.2016.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operational efficiency is a major indicator by which the profitability of a business process outsourcing (BPO) service is evaluated. To measure such operational efficiency, BPO service providers define and monitor a set of key performance indicators (KPI) (e.g., productivity of employees, turn-around-time). While a pair of clients can be directly compared using a KPI, comparing the aggregate client operations across multiple KPIs is non-trivial. This is primarily because KPIs are disparate in nature (e.g., cost is measured in dollar while turn-around-time is measured in minutes). In this paper, we present CoCOA, a framework that compares aggregate operations of clients in BPO services so that they can be viewed in a single pane of glass. Two key modules of CoCOA are: (a) client rank aggregator and (b) KPI importance classifier. For a given time period, the rank aggregator module determines an aggregate ranking of clients using variety of inputs (e.g., individual KPI rank, priority of a KPI). When the aggregate rank of a client deteriorates over successive time periods, KPI importance classifier identifies the responsible KPIs for such deterioration. Thus, CoCOA not only helps in comparing the aggregate operation of clients, but also provides prescriptive analytics for improving organizational performance for a given client. We evaluate our approach using anonymized data set collected from a real BPO business and show how responsible KPIs can be identified when there is a deterioration in aggregate client rank.","PeriodicalId":115693,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2016.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Operational efficiency is a major indicator by which the profitability of a business process outsourcing (BPO) service is evaluated. To measure such operational efficiency, BPO service providers define and monitor a set of key performance indicators (KPI) (e.g., productivity of employees, turn-around-time). While a pair of clients can be directly compared using a KPI, comparing the aggregate client operations across multiple KPIs is non-trivial. This is primarily because KPIs are disparate in nature (e.g., cost is measured in dollar while turn-around-time is measured in minutes). In this paper, we present CoCOA, a framework that compares aggregate operations of clients in BPO services so that they can be viewed in a single pane of glass. Two key modules of CoCOA are: (a) client rank aggregator and (b) KPI importance classifier. For a given time period, the rank aggregator module determines an aggregate ranking of clients using variety of inputs (e.g., individual KPI rank, priority of a KPI). When the aggregate rank of a client deteriorates over successive time periods, KPI importance classifier identifies the responsible KPIs for such deterioration. Thus, CoCOA not only helps in comparing the aggregate operation of clients, but also provides prescriptive analytics for improving organizational performance for a given client. We evaluate our approach using anonymized data set collected from a real BPO business and show how responsible KPIs can be identified when there is a deterioration in aggregate client rank.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个比较BPO服务中聚合客户操作的框架
运营效率是评估业务流程外包(BPO)服务盈利能力的主要指标。为了衡量这种运营效率,BPO服务提供商定义并监控一组关键绩效指标(KPI)(例如,员工生产率、周转时间)。虽然可以使用KPI直接比较一对客户端,但是跨多个KPI比较聚合的客户端操作是非常重要的。这主要是因为kpi本质上是不同的(例如,成本是以美元来衡量的,而周转时间是以分钟来衡量的)。在本文中,我们介绍了CoCOA,这是一个框架,用于比较BPO服务中客户端的聚合操作,以便可以在单个窗格中查看它们。CoCOA的两个关键模块是:(a)客户端排名聚合器和(b) KPI重要性分类器。对于给定的时间段,排名聚合器模块使用各种输入(例如,单个KPI排名,KPI的优先级)确定客户端的总体排名。当客户的总排名在连续的时间段内恶化时,KPI重要性分类器将识别导致这种恶化的责任KPI。因此,CoCOA不仅有助于比较客户机的总体操作,而且还为改进给定客户机的组织性能提供了规定性分析。我们使用从真实的业务流程外包业务中收集的匿名数据集来评估我们的方法,并展示了当客户总排名下降时如何识别负责任的kpi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing the Required Degree of Multitenancy Isolation: A Case Study of Cloud-Hosted Bug Tracking System Complexity Reduction: Local Activity Ranking by Resource Entropy for QoS-Aware Cloud Scheduling An Elasticity-Aware Governance Platform for Cloud Service Delivery An Approach for Modeling and Ranking Node-Level Stragglers in Cloud Datacenters Dynamic Selection for Service Composition Based on Temporal and QoS Constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1