Applying a cryptographic metric to post-quantum lattice-based signature algorithms

Markus Rautell, Outi-Marja Latvala, V. Vallivaara, Kimmo Halunen
{"title":"Applying a cryptographic metric to post-quantum lattice-based signature algorithms","authors":"Markus Rautell, Outi-Marja Latvala, V. Vallivaara, Kimmo Halunen","doi":"10.1145/3538969.3544438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring the security of cryptographic systems is not a simple task. Nevertheless, there is an increasing need for a cryptographic metric which could assist in decision making when choosing between various candidates. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has launched a process to standardize quantum-resistance public key encryption, key encapsulation and digital signature algorithms. This is NIST’s response to the threat posed by quantum computers against classical public key cryptography. In this paper, we apply a metric taxonomy, produced by earlier studies, to two NIST third round finalist digital signature algorithms Dilithium and Falcon in order to asses the effectiveness and extensiveness of the metric. Although, our results show that clear differences can be found with used metrics, we propose some improvements to them to allow more comprehensive analysis.","PeriodicalId":306813,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3538969.3544438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring the security of cryptographic systems is not a simple task. Nevertheless, there is an increasing need for a cryptographic metric which could assist in decision making when choosing between various candidates. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has launched a process to standardize quantum-resistance public key encryption, key encapsulation and digital signature algorithms. This is NIST’s response to the threat posed by quantum computers against classical public key cryptography. In this paper, we apply a metric taxonomy, produced by earlier studies, to two NIST third round finalist digital signature algorithms Dilithium and Falcon in order to asses the effectiveness and extensiveness of the metric. Although, our results show that clear differences can be found with used metrics, we propose some improvements to them to allow more comprehensive analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将密码度量应用于后量子格签名算法
测量加密系统的安全性并不是一项简单的任务。然而,越来越需要一种加密度量,它可以帮助在各种候选人之间进行选择时做出决策。美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)启动了一项标准化量子抗公钥加密、密钥封装和数字签名算法的进程。这是NIST对量子计算机对经典公钥加密构成威胁的回应。在本文中,我们将早期研究产生的度量分类法应用于NIST第三轮决赛数字签名算法Dilithium和Falcon,以评估度量的有效性和广泛性。尽管我们的结果表明,使用度量标准可以发现明显的差异,但我们建议对它们进行一些改进,以便进行更全面的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web Bot Detection Evasion Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Cyber-security measures for protecting EPES systems in the 5G area An Internet-Wide View of Connected Cars: Discovery of Exposed Automotive Devices Secure Mobile Agents on Embedded Boards: a TPM based solution SoK: Applications and Challenges of using Recommender Systems in Cybersecurity Incident Handling and Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1