The State and Media Financing: Bulgaria and the Mediterranean Media Model

Ivo Indjov
{"title":"The State and Media Financing: Bulgaria and the Mediterranean Media Model","authors":"Ivo Indjov","doi":"10.54664/zkql5823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the applicability of the comparative framework of Hallin and Mancini (2004) with their three models of media‒politics relations (Mediterranean or Polarized Pluralist Model, North/ Central European or Democratic Corporatist Model, and North Atlantic or Liberal Model) to a post-communist country like Bulgaria. The answer to this question is sought through a study of the role of the state in relation to the media system, particularly the state funding of media in its various forms. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the Bulgarian media system is most similar to the Mediterranean Model due to the power of еtatism (the state finances public media, and the government buys media love through state and municipal advertising). At the same time, ineffective media regulation favors media concentration and the instrumentalization of large government media groups. The processes of rapid liberalization, privatization and deregulation in the media sector after 1989 brought Bulgaria closer to the countries included in the Liberal Model. Therefore, its media system is hybrid to some extent, but the similarities with the Mediterranean Model remain in the lead. The clientelism through which they are tamed, resp. corrupt the media, brings Bulgaria closer to the Latin American countries where it is much stronger than in the Mediterranean region (Hallin, Papathanassopoulos 2002). The concluding part predicts that, in the future, the analysis of the Bulgarian media system can be enhanced with a study of the applicability of the concepts of the “captured liberal model” of the media (in Latin America) and the “captured media” in the post-communist world.","PeriodicalId":346008,"journal":{"name":"21st Century Media and Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Century Media and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/zkql5823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examines the applicability of the comparative framework of Hallin and Mancini (2004) with their three models of media‒politics relations (Mediterranean or Polarized Pluralist Model, North/ Central European or Democratic Corporatist Model, and North Atlantic or Liberal Model) to a post-communist country like Bulgaria. The answer to this question is sought through a study of the role of the state in relation to the media system, particularly the state funding of media in its various forms. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the Bulgarian media system is most similar to the Mediterranean Model due to the power of еtatism (the state finances public media, and the government buys media love through state and municipal advertising). At the same time, ineffective media regulation favors media concentration and the instrumentalization of large government media groups. The processes of rapid liberalization, privatization and deregulation in the media sector after 1989 brought Bulgaria closer to the countries included in the Liberal Model. Therefore, its media system is hybrid to some extent, but the similarities with the Mediterranean Model remain in the lead. The clientelism through which they are tamed, resp. corrupt the media, brings Bulgaria closer to the Latin American countries where it is much stronger than in the Mediterranean region (Hallin, Papathanassopoulos 2002). The concluding part predicts that, in the future, the analysis of the Bulgarian media system can be enhanced with a study of the applicability of the concepts of the “captured liberal model” of the media (in Latin America) and the “captured media” in the post-communist world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家与媒体融资:保加利亚与地中海媒体模式
本研究考察了Hallin和Mancini(2004)的比较框架及其媒体-政治关系的三种模式(地中海或极化多元主义模式,北欧/中欧或民主社团主义模式,北大西洋或自由主义模式)对保加利亚等后共产主义国家的适用性。这个问题的答案是通过研究国家在媒体系统中的作用,特别是国家对各种形式的媒体的资助来寻求的。分析得出的结论是,保加利亚的媒体系统与地中海模式最相似,这是由于集权主义的力量(国家为公共媒体提供资金,政府通过国家和市政广告购买媒体的爱)。与此同时,无效的媒体监管有利于媒体集中和大型政府媒体集团的工具化。1989年以后媒体部门的迅速自由化、私有化和解除管制的进程使保加利亚更接近自由模式所包括的国家。因此,其媒体体系在一定程度上是混合型的,但与地中海模式的相似之处仍处于领先地位。他们被驯服的庇护主义。腐败的媒体,使保加利亚更接近拉丁美洲国家,在那里它比地中海地区强大得多(Hallin, papathanasopoulos 2002)。结语部分预测,未来对保加利亚媒体系统的分析,可以透过研究媒体“被俘获的自由模式”(拉丁美洲)与后共产主义世界“被俘获的媒体”概念的适用性,来加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Media View of Traditions in Modern Bulgarian Society Interdiscursivity of New Media (Following the Content Examples of the Belarusian Media Holding “Culture and Art”) Georgi Yurukov: The Underappreciated and Forgotten Book Publisher Local Festivals through the Eyes of the Media Influencers as Creators of Valuable Brand Content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1