Equal Pricing or Free Pricing? The Pricing Strategies of B2C Platform

Hou-ping Tian, Shuang Zheng, Chun-fang Jiang, Chang-xian Liu
{"title":"Equal Pricing or Free Pricing? The Pricing Strategies of B2C Platform","authors":"Hou-ping Tian, Shuang Zheng, Chun-fang Jiang, Chang-xian Liu","doi":"10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"B2C platform, who provides unprecedented opportunities to enterprises to directly access to the customers, often has resale channel and direct channel simultaneously. In resale channel it purchases the products from the manufacturer and then resells them to the customers; in direct channel it offers the platform to the manufacturer to sell directly and charges the manufacturer a proportion of fees. Since products sell via both channels, a challenging problem to B2C platform is that when should it implement equal pricing strategy (i.e., the retail price equals to the direct selling price) or free pricing strategy (they set the prices respectively). We compare the pricing strategies by using game-theoretical model. Analyses show two interesting findings: Firstly, equal pricing strategy can mitigate channel conflict; however, it does not necessarily increase B2C platform’s profits. Secondly, the choice of pricing strategy is affected by the customers’ channel preference: B2C platform prefers equal pricing strategy only when customers are resale channel oriented; otherwise it prefers free pricing strategy. However, to the manufacturer, it always prefers free pricing strategy and enjoys the freedom.","PeriodicalId":226426,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

B2C platform, who provides unprecedented opportunities to enterprises to directly access to the customers, often has resale channel and direct channel simultaneously. In resale channel it purchases the products from the manufacturer and then resells them to the customers; in direct channel it offers the platform to the manufacturer to sell directly and charges the manufacturer a proportion of fees. Since products sell via both channels, a challenging problem to B2C platform is that when should it implement equal pricing strategy (i.e., the retail price equals to the direct selling price) or free pricing strategy (they set the prices respectively). We compare the pricing strategies by using game-theoretical model. Analyses show two interesting findings: Firstly, equal pricing strategy can mitigate channel conflict; however, it does not necessarily increase B2C platform’s profits. Secondly, the choice of pricing strategy is affected by the customers’ channel preference: B2C platform prefers equal pricing strategy only when customers are resale channel oriented; otherwise it prefers free pricing strategy. However, to the manufacturer, it always prefers free pricing strategy and enjoys the freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平等定价还是免费定价?B2C平台的定价策略
B2C平台往往同时拥有转售渠道和直销渠道,为企业直接接触客户提供了前所未有的机会。在转售渠道中,它从制造商那里购买产品,然后转售给客户;在直销渠道中,它为制造商提供直接销售的平台,并向制造商收取一定比例的费用。由于产品是通过两种渠道销售的,B2C平台面临的一个挑战是,它应该在什么时候实施平等定价策略(即零售价格等于直销价格)还是自由定价策略(即他们各自定价)。运用博弈论模型对定价策略进行了比较。分析得出两个有趣的发现:第一,平等定价策略可以缓解渠道冲突;然而,这并不一定会增加B2C平台的利润。其次,定价策略的选择受到消费者渠道偏好的影响:B2C平台只有在消费者以转售渠道为导向时才会选择平等定价策略;否则,它更喜欢免费定价策略。然而,对于制造商来说,它总是倾向于自由定价策略,享受自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Inventory Optimization Model Under Demand Uncertainty for Autonomous Multi-site Inventory Planning with Material Substitutability and Transshipment Sustainability Assessment of Contract Farming Broiler Chicken Supply Chain Using Rap-Poultry Concept Design of a System Architecture for a Manufacturing Cyber-physical Digital Twin System Robust Optimization Based Heuristic Approach for Solving Stochastic Multi-Mode Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem Bi-objective Multistage Decentralized Supply Chain Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1