The tale of the two Sultanates, Oman and Brunei: Foreign policy and bilateral relations

G. Hassan, Ahmed Hamad Al Rabaani, M. Nejjari
{"title":"The tale of the two Sultanates, Oman and Brunei: Foreign policy and bilateral relations","authors":"G. Hassan, Ahmed Hamad Al Rabaani, M. Nejjari","doi":"10.1080/00927678.2022.2089523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Oman and Brunei are two countries with a long history of sultanic regimes. A sultanate is a kingdom ruled by a Muslim monarch. Because of these two countries’ geopolitical and geostrategic locations, they are very important in global affairs. At the same time, although situated in the highly tense regions of the Middle East and Southeast Asia respectively, Oman and Brunei are generally quite stable. They have recently become involved in China’s global economic project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Using a theory of small states, this article applies a qualitative research methodology focusing mainly on foreign policy analysis in a comprehensive analytical framework. The study uses face-to-face and by-correspondence interviews with government officials from both sultanates. It investigates whether the domestic determinants of small states’ foreign policy directly affect the bilateral relations between the two sultanates. The main finding of this study is that Oman and Brunei have greatly benefited through the establishment of a satisfactory bilateral relationship based mainly on four pillars from the list of determinants of small states’ foreign policy: historical connectivity, an Islamic monarchical dynastic system of governance, a state rentier economy, and shared foreign policy principles.","PeriodicalId":392598,"journal":{"name":"Asian Affairs: An American Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Affairs: An American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2022.2089523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Oman and Brunei are two countries with a long history of sultanic regimes. A sultanate is a kingdom ruled by a Muslim monarch. Because of these two countries’ geopolitical and geostrategic locations, they are very important in global affairs. At the same time, although situated in the highly tense regions of the Middle East and Southeast Asia respectively, Oman and Brunei are generally quite stable. They have recently become involved in China’s global economic project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Using a theory of small states, this article applies a qualitative research methodology focusing mainly on foreign policy analysis in a comprehensive analytical framework. The study uses face-to-face and by-correspondence interviews with government officials from both sultanates. It investigates whether the domestic determinants of small states’ foreign policy directly affect the bilateral relations between the two sultanates. The main finding of this study is that Oman and Brunei have greatly benefited through the establishment of a satisfactory bilateral relationship based mainly on four pillars from the list of determinants of small states’ foreign policy: historical connectivity, an Islamic monarchical dynastic system of governance, a state rentier economy, and shared foreign policy principles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿曼和文莱两个苏丹国的故事:外交政策和双边关系
阿曼和文莱是两个有着悠久苏丹统治历史的国家。苏丹国是由穆斯林君主统治的王国。由于这两个国家的地缘政治和地缘战略位置,它们在全球事务中非常重要。与此同时,阿曼和文莱虽然分别位于中东和东南亚高度紧张的地区,但总体上还是相当稳定的。他们最近参与了中国的全球经济项目“一带一路”(BRI)。本文以小国理论为基础,运用定性研究方法,在综合分析框架下对外交政策进行分析。这项研究采用面对面和函授的方式采访了两个苏丹国的政府官员。它调查了小国外交政策的国内决定因素是否直接影响两个苏丹国之间的双边关系。本研究的主要发现是,阿曼和文莱通过建立令人满意的双边关系而受益匪浅,这种关系主要基于小国外交政策决定因素清单中的四大支柱:历史联系、伊斯兰君主制王朝治理体系、国家食利者经济和共同的外交政策原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
War in Gaza Strip and relations with the Middle East: evaluating New Delhi’s steps in the “Jenga” Critical policy discourse analysis on the conflict resolution in Thailand’s deep South Mekong–ROK cooperation: a perspective from Thailand Politics and Muslim women in the Deep South of Thailand: roles, opportunities, and challenges The nature of Lao security challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1