LANDSCAPE ATTRIBUTES AND NEST-SITE SELECTION IN WILD TURKEYS

The Auk Pub Date : 1999-10-01 DOI:10.2307/4089671
W. Thogmartin
{"title":"LANDSCAPE ATTRIBUTES AND NEST-SITE SELECTION IN WILD TURKEYS","authors":"W. Thogmartin","doi":"10.2307/4089671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rates of nesting participation, renesting, and nesting success for Wild Tur- keys (Meleagris gallopavo) in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, are among the lowest re- corded in the eastern United States. I studied spatial attributes of 113 Wild Turkey nests to determine landscape-scale habitat characteristics that were important for nest placement and survival. Hens generally nested close to roads in large pine patches that occurred on southeast-facing slopes. Hens selected shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata; 68.1%) over mixed hard- wood (23.9%), hardwood (0.9%), and open areas (7.1%). Most of the hens (57.5%) placed their nests in edge habitat, but placement in these areas did not influence nesting success. Rather, female turkeys appeared to respond to a high risk of predation by placing nests in large patches, away from areas of high edge density favored by nest predators. Mean patch size chosen by nesting females (6,912.6 + SE of 634.5 ha) was considerably larger than the mean patch size for the study area (31.4 + 7.8 ha). Although most hens nested close to roads, this association appeared to be detrimental to nesting success because all nests close to roads were unsuccessful. In general, habitat characteristics examined at the level of patch and stand were good predictors of nest location but poor predictors of nesting success, possibly due to a high abundance of edge habitat in the landscape. This large amount of edge apparently sustained predator populations that made even the largest patches hazardous for nesting by Wild Turkeys. Therefore, the lack of suitable nest sites may limit population size of Wild Turkeys in the Ouachita Mountains. Received 10 July 1998, accepted 25 January 1999.","PeriodicalId":382448,"journal":{"name":"The Auk","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Auk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4089671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

Rates of nesting participation, renesting, and nesting success for Wild Tur- keys (Meleagris gallopavo) in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, are among the lowest re- corded in the eastern United States. I studied spatial attributes of 113 Wild Turkey nests to determine landscape-scale habitat characteristics that were important for nest placement and survival. Hens generally nested close to roads in large pine patches that occurred on southeast-facing slopes. Hens selected shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata; 68.1%) over mixed hard- wood (23.9%), hardwood (0.9%), and open areas (7.1%). Most of the hens (57.5%) placed their nests in edge habitat, but placement in these areas did not influence nesting success. Rather, female turkeys appeared to respond to a high risk of predation by placing nests in large patches, away from areas of high edge density favored by nest predators. Mean patch size chosen by nesting females (6,912.6 + SE of 634.5 ha) was considerably larger than the mean patch size for the study area (31.4 + 7.8 ha). Although most hens nested close to roads, this association appeared to be detrimental to nesting success because all nests close to roads were unsuccessful. In general, habitat characteristics examined at the level of patch and stand were good predictors of nest location but poor predictors of nesting success, possibly due to a high abundance of edge habitat in the landscape. This large amount of edge apparently sustained predator populations that made even the largest patches hazardous for nesting by Wild Turkeys. Therefore, the lack of suitable nest sites may limit population size of Wild Turkeys in the Ouachita Mountains. Received 10 July 1998, accepted 25 January 1999.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生火鸡的景观属性和巢址选择
在阿肯色州的瓦希托山脉,野生土拨鼠(Meleagris gallopavo)的筑巢参与率、抗拒率和筑巢成功率是美国东部有记录以来最低的。研究了113个野生火鸡巢的空间属性,以确定景观尺度的栖息地特征,这些特征对巢的放置和生存至关重要。母鸡通常在靠近道路的大片松林中筑巢,这些松林出现在面向东南的斜坡上。母鸡选择短叶松(Pinus echinata;68.1%)高于混合硬木(23.9%)、硬木(0.9%)和开阔地区(7.1%)。大多数母鸡(57.5%)在边缘生境筑巢,但在这些区域筑巢对产卵成功率没有影响。相反,雌性火鸡似乎会对被捕食的高风险做出反应,它们会在大片区域筑巢,远离那些边缘密度高、容易被捕食者捕食的区域。雌鸟选择的平均斑块面积(6912.6 + SE = 634.5 ha)明显大于研究区平均斑块面积(31.4 + 7.8 ha)。尽管大多数母鸡在公路附近筑巢,但这种关联似乎不利于筑巢成功,因为所有靠近公路的巢都不成功。一般来说,在斑块和林分水平上检测的栖息地特征可以很好地预测筑巢位置,但预测筑巢成功的能力较差,这可能是由于景观中边缘栖息地的丰度很高。这种巨大的边缘显然维持了食肉动物的数量,使得即使是最大的补丁对野生火鸡的筑巢也很危险。因此,缺乏合适的筑巢地点可能会限制野生火鸡在瓦希托山脉的人口规模。1998年7月10日收,1999年1月25日收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flight paths: how a passionate and quirky group of pioneering scientists solved the mystery of bird migration Correction to: The biotic and abiotic drivers of timing of breeding and the consequences of breeding early in a changing world Identification Guide to North American Birds, Part I (second edition) Telomere length links with physiological phenotype and breeding patterns in a long-lived seabird The evolution of enclosed nesting in passerines is shaped by competition, energetic costs, and predation threat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1