Relationship between Critical Care Nurses’ Knowledge and Clinical Decision Making Role in Managing Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Fatma Mohammed, Aml Ebrahem
{"title":"Relationship between Critical Care Nurses’ Knowledge and Clinical Decision Making Role in Managing Mechanically Ventilated Patients","authors":"Fatma Mohammed, Aml Ebrahem","doi":"10.21608/menj.2022.271724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving procedure that is indicated for critically ill patients. Clinical decision making in nursing practice is a complex process that is integrated into the nursing profession. Critical care nurses are continually faced with situations where they have to make knowledgeable decisions. Purpose: To identify the relationship between critical care nurses‟ knowledge and clinical decision making role in managing mechanically ventilated patients. Research Design: A descriptive correlational research design was used in this study. Setting: The study was conducted at intensive care units in Nasser Institute. Sample: A purposive sample of 109 critical care nurses were selected. Instruments: Data was collected using three instruments (critical care nurses‟ characteristics structured questionnaire, critical care nurses' knowledge structured interview questionnaire, and clinical decision making in nursing scale (CDMNS)). Results: The majority of the studied sample (95.4%) had a satisfactory level of knowledge about caring for patients on mechanical ventilation, more than two thirds of the studied sample (73.4%) had moderate insight of decision making role. There is a statistical significant positive correlation between total decision making and general information about, communication, checking ventilator settings and modes, standard care for endotracheal suction, and management of ventilator alarm. Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between nurses‟ knowledge and clinical decision making role. Recommendations: The principles of mechanical ventilation must be explained and incorporated into interactive training programs, Training courses regarding clinical decision making for critical care nurses must be provided. Replication of the same study on larger probability samples at different geographical locations for data generalization.","PeriodicalId":181618,"journal":{"name":"Menoufia Nursing Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menoufia Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/menj.2022.271724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving procedure that is indicated for critically ill patients. Clinical decision making in nursing practice is a complex process that is integrated into the nursing profession. Critical care nurses are continually faced with situations where they have to make knowledgeable decisions. Purpose: To identify the relationship between critical care nurses‟ knowledge and clinical decision making role in managing mechanically ventilated patients. Research Design: A descriptive correlational research design was used in this study. Setting: The study was conducted at intensive care units in Nasser Institute. Sample: A purposive sample of 109 critical care nurses were selected. Instruments: Data was collected using three instruments (critical care nurses‟ characteristics structured questionnaire, critical care nurses' knowledge structured interview questionnaire, and clinical decision making in nursing scale (CDMNS)). Results: The majority of the studied sample (95.4%) had a satisfactory level of knowledge about caring for patients on mechanical ventilation, more than two thirds of the studied sample (73.4%) had moderate insight of decision making role. There is a statistical significant positive correlation between total decision making and general information about, communication, checking ventilator settings and modes, standard care for endotracheal suction, and management of ventilator alarm. Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between nurses‟ knowledge and clinical decision making role. Recommendations: The principles of mechanical ventilation must be explained and incorporated into interactive training programs, Training courses regarding clinical decision making for critical care nurses must be provided. Replication of the same study on larger probability samples at different geographical locations for data generalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护护士知识与机械通气患者临床决策作用的关系
背景:机械通气是一种适用于危重患者的救命手段。护理实践中的临床决策是一个复杂的过程,它与护理专业相结合。重症护理护士不断面临的情况下,他们必须作出明智的决定。目的:探讨重症监护护士知识水平与机械通气患者临床决策作用的关系。研究设计:本研究采用描述性相关研究设计。环境:研究在Nasser研究所的重症监护病房进行。样本:目的样本为109名重症护理护士。工具:采用重症监护护士特征结构化问卷、重症监护护士知识结构化访谈问卷和临床护理决策量表(CDMNS)三种工具收集数据。结果:绝大多数(95.4%)的研究样本对机械通气患者的护理知识有满意程度,超过三分之二(73.4%)的研究样本对决策作用有中等程度的了解。总决策与一般信息、沟通、检查呼吸机设置和模式、气管内吸吸标准护理、呼吸机报警管理有统计学显著正相关。结论:护士知识水平与临床决策作用呈正相关。建议:必须解释机械通气的原理,并将其纳入互动培训计划,必须为重症护理护士提供临床决策培训课程。在不同地理位置的大概率样本上复制相同的研究,以进行数据推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Mauk Nursing Rehabilitation Model on Knowledge, Self- Efficacy and Coping Strategies among Post Stroke Elderly Patients Effect of Brisk Walking Exercise in Green Space on Blood Glucose Level among Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Effect of a Distraction Method on Pain, Anxiety and Behavioral Distress among Children during Venipuncture Association Between Family Needs Perception and Satisfaction in Relation to Used ICU Visiting Policy Autism Spectrum Disorder Care Education: Improving Parents' Knowledge and Caregiving Practices for their Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1