Standardizing production of domain components

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1997-06-01 DOI:10.1145/260558.260562
J. Favaro
{"title":"Standardizing production of domain components","authors":"J. Favaro","doi":"10.1145/260558.260562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"m Domain analysis is a promising path for identifying standard software architectures. Recent advances in the technology and documentation of objectoriented frameworks have made it possible to link the products of domain analysis to concrete software artifacts. The result is a coherent lifecycle process for the domain engineering of reusable components. or nearly two decades, software engineers attempted to create a software component industry based on a model of a repository of “components” or “parts” that could be accessed by many different kinds of (possibly totally unrelated) applications. It took several years of spectacular failures to make it clear that this approach could not succeed. It became increasingly clear that components could only be produced in the context of a domain. Such a domain might be telecommunications, banking, etc. Most current efforts are aimed at designing what are known as domain architectures—that is, the standard architectures of systems created in particular domains. In the computer hardware area, this has been accomplished with great success: A personal computer has a motherboard, expander slots, keyboard, monitor, etc., conformant to a standard architecture. But in the software area, much less is known. With the identification of a domain architecture, it becomes possible to develop systematically reusable domain components that fit within that domain architecture (via suitable interconnection mechanisms). The discipline that has arisen around standardizing production of domain components is known as domain analysis. The companion discipline of domain engineering—the systematic creation of domain architectures based upon the results of domain analysis—has flourished in recent years with the rise of object-oriented framework technologies and patterns.","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/260558.260562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

m Domain analysis is a promising path for identifying standard software architectures. Recent advances in the technology and documentation of objectoriented frameworks have made it possible to link the products of domain analysis to concrete software artifacts. The result is a coherent lifecycle process for the domain engineering of reusable components. or nearly two decades, software engineers attempted to create a software component industry based on a model of a repository of “components” or “parts” that could be accessed by many different kinds of (possibly totally unrelated) applications. It took several years of spectacular failures to make it clear that this approach could not succeed. It became increasingly clear that components could only be produced in the context of a domain. Such a domain might be telecommunications, banking, etc. Most current efforts are aimed at designing what are known as domain architectures—that is, the standard architectures of systems created in particular domains. In the computer hardware area, this has been accomplished with great success: A personal computer has a motherboard, expander slots, keyboard, monitor, etc., conformant to a standard architecture. But in the software area, much less is known. With the identification of a domain architecture, it becomes possible to develop systematically reusable domain components that fit within that domain architecture (via suitable interconnection mechanisms). The discipline that has arisen around standardizing production of domain components is known as domain analysis. The companion discipline of domain engineering—the systematic creation of domain architectures based upon the results of domain analysis—has flourished in recent years with the rise of object-oriented framework technologies and patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化领域组件的生产
领域分析是识别标准软件体系结构的一个很有前途的途径。面向对象框架的技术和文档的最新进展使得将领域分析的产品与具体的软件工件联系起来成为可能。其结果是可重用组件领域工程的一个连贯的生命周期过程。近二十年来,软件工程师试图创建一个基于“组件”或“部件”存储库模型的软件组件产业,这些“组件”或“部件”可以被许多不同类型的(可能完全不相关的)应用程序访问。经过几年的惨痛失败,人们才明白这种方法不可能成功。越来越清楚的是,组件只能在一个域的上下文中产生。这样的领域可能是电信、银行等。大多数当前的努力都旨在设计所谓的领域体系结构,即在特定领域中创建的系统的标准体系结构。在计算机硬件领域,这已经取得了巨大的成功:个人计算机具有符合标准体系结构的主板、扩展槽、键盘、显示器等。但在软件领域,人们所知的要少得多。有了领域体系结构的标识,就有可能开发适合该领域体系结构的系统可重用领域组件(通过合适的互连机制)。围绕领域组件的标准化生产而产生的学科被称为领域分析。近年来,随着面向对象框架技术和模式的兴起,领域工程的同伴学科——基于领域分析结果的领域体系结构的系统创建——蓬勃发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A model for Internet printing Interoperability testing for the Internet printing protocol The birth of the Internet printing protocol (IPP) Network externalities in software systems Compatibility, standards, and software production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1