Direct Percutaneous Tracheostomy from NIV in ICU Patients with Respiratory Failure - A Case Series

L. Rahman
{"title":"Direct Percutaneous Tracheostomy from NIV in ICU Patients with Respiratory Failure - A Case Series","authors":"L. Rahman","doi":"10.23880/accmj-16000146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nationally thousands of patients every year require endotracheal intubation after failure of non-invasive ventilation for a multitude of pathologies. These pathologies include but are not limited to chest infections, exacerbations of known lung disease, pancreatitis, neuromuscular diseases and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some of these patients may also be severely haemodynamically unstable and therefore intubation may be associated with a high risk of cardiovascular collapse despite the clinician’s best intentions. Patients that will require mechanical ventilation for a prolonged period or be slow to wean off mechanical ventilation can often be accurately predictable. We identified three patients and performed a percutaneous tracheostomy directly from NIV whilst bypassing endotracheal intubation. All 3 of these patients were severely haemodynamically unstable to the extent it was felt that all 3 may completely cardiovascular collapse in the induction or sedative period. However all 3 required invasive ventilation. The procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance, with local anaesthetic infiltration and under light sedation. We describe all three of these patients. The procedure was well tolerated in all 3 cases. Airway care and tracheal suctioning could start immediately after the procedure. As these patients never had to be sedated and ventilated for a prolonged period, no deconditioning occurred. A change to their pre-tracheostomy ventilator settings was not always necessary and weaning could begin promptly. By avoiding the typical 7-10 day period of intubation and deconditioning, it is approximated ITU stay could be cut by up to 7 days. This can have a significant economic impact in both ITU bed days as well as physical capacity. We devised a safety checklist to maintain safety during the procedure, advocating the use of ultrasound whilst remaining aware at all times of the potential urgent need for airway protection.","PeriodicalId":313122,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia & Critical Care Medicine Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia & Critical Care Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/accmj-16000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nationally thousands of patients every year require endotracheal intubation after failure of non-invasive ventilation for a multitude of pathologies. These pathologies include but are not limited to chest infections, exacerbations of known lung disease, pancreatitis, neuromuscular diseases and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some of these patients may also be severely haemodynamically unstable and therefore intubation may be associated with a high risk of cardiovascular collapse despite the clinician’s best intentions. Patients that will require mechanical ventilation for a prolonged period or be slow to wean off mechanical ventilation can often be accurately predictable. We identified three patients and performed a percutaneous tracheostomy directly from NIV whilst bypassing endotracheal intubation. All 3 of these patients were severely haemodynamically unstable to the extent it was felt that all 3 may completely cardiovascular collapse in the induction or sedative period. However all 3 required invasive ventilation. The procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance, with local anaesthetic infiltration and under light sedation. We describe all three of these patients. The procedure was well tolerated in all 3 cases. Airway care and tracheal suctioning could start immediately after the procedure. As these patients never had to be sedated and ventilated for a prolonged period, no deconditioning occurred. A change to their pre-tracheostomy ventilator settings was not always necessary and weaning could begin promptly. By avoiding the typical 7-10 day period of intubation and deconditioning, it is approximated ITU stay could be cut by up to 7 days. This can have a significant economic impact in both ITU bed days as well as physical capacity. We devised a safety checklist to maintain safety during the procedure, advocating the use of ultrasound whilst remaining aware at all times of the potential urgent need for airway protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICU呼吸衰竭患者直接经皮气管切开术-一个病例系列
在全国范围内,每年有成千上万的患者在无创通气失败后需要气管插管。这些病理包括但不限于胸部感染、已知肺部疾病的恶化、胰腺炎、神经肌肉疾病和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。其中一些患者也可能有严重的血流动力学不稳定,因此插管可能与心血管衰竭的高风险相关,尽管临床医生的初衷是好的。需要长时间机械通气或缓慢脱离机械通气的患者通常可以准确预测。我们确定了3例患者,并直接从NIV进行经皮气管造口术,同时绕过气管插管。3例患者均有严重的血流动力学不稳定,在诱导期或镇静期均有完全性心血管衰竭的危险。然而,所有3例患者均需要有创通气。手术在超声引导下进行,局部麻醉浸润,轻度镇静。我们描述了这三个病人。所有3例患者对手术的耐受性均良好。手术后可立即开始气道护理和气管吸痰。由于这些患者从未需要长时间的镇静和通气,因此没有发生条件反射。改变气管切开术前的呼吸机设置并不总是必要的,可以立即开始脱机。通过避免典型的7-10天插管和调整期间,国际电联的停留时间大约可以减少至多7天。这可能对国际电联的工作时间和实际能力产生重大的经济影响。我们设计了一份安全检查表,以确保手术过程中的安全,提倡使用超声波,同时在任何时候都要意识到可能迫切需要气道保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Non - Mitral Cardiovascular Surgery: A Case Series Analysis Propofol for Conscious Sedation for Fibreoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: Comparison with Fentanyl - Midazolam Combination Paediatric Perioperative Life Support: Safety in the Fast Lane Practical Tips in Neuromodulation for Pain Neuroendoscopy: What an Anaesthesiologist Should Know?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1