The Communication and Publication of Reasons for Decisions on Arbitrator Challenges: Increasing the Transparency of Standards and the Predictability of Decisions

A. Carlevaris
{"title":"The Communication and Publication of Reasons for Decisions on Arbitrator Challenges: Increasing the Transparency of Standards and the Predictability of Decisions","authors":"A. Carlevaris","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2021004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenges of arbitrators are among the most important events in international arbitration proceedings. Given their importance, they are a major target of the call for transparency in international arbitration.This article examines recent initiatives undertaken by a number of arbitral institutions to provide reasoned decisions to parties and arbitrators and to publish them for the benefit of the wider arbitration community. The author then focuses on the recent evolution in the rules and practice of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, which have evolved from a position where the communication of reasons underlying challenge decisions was considered contrary to the institution’s mandatory rules to a position where reasons are routinely provided on request.The author concludes that, whilst providing reasoned decisions is essential to foster their legitimacy and the trust that parties and arbitrators place in the process, only publication can achieve further goals, such as developing a jurisprudence on arbitrators’ independence and impartiality, enhancing the predictability of decisions and protecting the validity and enforceability of arbitral awards.To achieve these goals, publication should not be limited to succinct summaries, but should include a full account of the factual and legal background of the challenge.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2021004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Challenges of arbitrators are among the most important events in international arbitration proceedings. Given their importance, they are a major target of the call for transparency in international arbitration.This article examines recent initiatives undertaken by a number of arbitral institutions to provide reasoned decisions to parties and arbitrators and to publish them for the benefit of the wider arbitration community. The author then focuses on the recent evolution in the rules and practice of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, which have evolved from a position where the communication of reasons underlying challenge decisions was considered contrary to the institution’s mandatory rules to a position where reasons are routinely provided on request.The author concludes that, whilst providing reasoned decisions is essential to foster their legitimacy and the trust that parties and arbitrators place in the process, only publication can achieve further goals, such as developing a jurisprudence on arbitrators’ independence and impartiality, enhancing the predictability of decisions and protecting the validity and enforceability of arbitral awards.To achieve these goals, publication should not be limited to succinct summaries, but should include a full account of the factual and legal background of the challenge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于仲裁员质疑的裁决理由的沟通和公布:提高标准的透明度和裁决的可预测性
仲裁员的挑战是国际仲裁程序中最重要的事件之一。鉴于它们的重要性,它们是呼吁提高国际仲裁透明度的主要目标。本文审查了一些仲裁机构最近采取的举措,向当事人和仲裁员提供合理的裁决,并将其公布,以造福更广泛的仲裁界。然后,作者着重讨论了国际商会国际仲裁法院的规则和惯例的最近演变,该规则和惯例已从一种认为提交质疑决定的理由违反该机构的强制性规则的立场演变为一种应请求通常提供理由的立场。作者的结论是,虽然提供合理的裁决对于促进其合法性以及当事人和仲裁员在此过程中的信任至关重要,但只有公布才能实现进一步的目标,例如发展关于仲裁员独立性和公正性的法理学,提高裁决的可预测性,并保护仲裁裁决的有效性和可执行性。为了实现这些目标,出版物不应局限于简洁的摘要,而应包括对挑战的事实和法律背景的全面说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changed Circumstances and Oil and Gas Contracts Aramco: The Story of the World’s Most Valuable Oil Concession and Its Landmark Arbitration Petroleum Concessions in Egypt: A Recipe for Disputes? Stabilization Clauses: Do They Have a Future? COVID-19 and the Exceptions to Contractual Liability in Arab Contract Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1