Computation time analysis of centralized and distributed optimization algorithms applied to automated irrigation networks

A. Farhadi, P. Dower, M. Cantoni
{"title":"Computation time analysis of centralized and distributed optimization algorithms applied to automated irrigation networks","authors":"A. Farhadi, P. Dower, M. Cantoni","doi":"10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the computation time of two algorithms for solving a structured constrained linear optimal control problem with finite horizon quadratic cost within the context of automated irrigation networks. The first is a standard centralized algorithm based on the active set method that does not exploit problem structure. The second is distributed and is based on a consensus algorithm, not specifically tailored to account for system structure. It is shown that there is a significant advantage in terms of computation overhead (the time spent computing the optimal solution) in using the second algorithm in large-scale networks. Specifically, for a fixed horizon length the computation overhead of the centralized algorithm grows as O(n5) with the number n of sub-systems. By contrast, it is observed via a combination of analysis and experiment that given n times resources for computation the computation overhead of the distributed algorithm grows as O(n) with the number n of sub-systems.","PeriodicalId":177490,"journal":{"name":"2013 Australian Control Conference","volume":"689 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Australian Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper compares the computation time of two algorithms for solving a structured constrained linear optimal control problem with finite horizon quadratic cost within the context of automated irrigation networks. The first is a standard centralized algorithm based on the active set method that does not exploit problem structure. The second is distributed and is based on a consensus algorithm, not specifically tailored to account for system structure. It is shown that there is a significant advantage in terms of computation overhead (the time spent computing the optimal solution) in using the second algorithm in large-scale networks. Specifically, for a fixed horizon length the computation overhead of the centralized algorithm grows as O(n5) with the number n of sub-systems. By contrast, it is observed via a combination of analysis and experiment that given n times resources for computation the computation overhead of the distributed algorithm grows as O(n) with the number n of sub-systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集中式和分布式优化算法在自动化灌溉网络中的计算时间分析
本文比较了两种算法求解具有有限水平二次代价的结构化约束线性最优控制问题的计算时间。第一种是不利用问题结构的基于活动集方法的标准集中式算法。第二种是分布式的,基于共识算法,而不是专门为系统结构量身定制的。结果表明,在大规模网络中使用第二种算法在计算开销(计算最优解所花费的时间)方面具有显著的优势。具体来说,对于固定的水平长度,集中式算法的计算开销随着子系统数量的n增长为O(n5)。相比之下,通过分析和实验相结合观察到,给定n倍的计算资源,分布式算法的计算开销随着子系统数量的n增长为O(n)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A gap metric perspective of well-posedness for nonlinear feedback interconnections Heteroclinic optimal control solutions for attitude motion planning On the uniform global pre-asymptotic stability of closed sets for switched hybrid systems Control the active and reactive powers of three-phase grid-connected photovoltaic inverters using feedback linearization and fuzzy logic Active piezoelectric shunt control of an Atomic Force Microscope micro-cantilever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1